Modeling the Covid-19 Pandemic Response of the US States
Neofotistos, G.; Kaxiras, E.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe United States of America (USA) has been the country worst affected, in absolute terms, by the Covid-19 pandemic. The country comprises 50 states under a federal system. The impact of the pandemic has resulted in different responses at the state level, which are driven by differing intervention policies, demographics, connectedness and other factors. Understanding the dynamics of the Covid-19 pandemic at the state level is essential in predicting its future evolution. ObjectiveOur objective is to identify and characterize multiple waves of the pandemic by analyzing the reported infected population curve in each of the 50 US states. Based on the intensity of the waves, characterized by declining, stationary, or increasing strengths, each states response can be inferred and quantified. MethodsWe apply a recently proposed multiple-wave model to fit the infected population data for each state in USA, and use the proposed Pandemic Response Index to quantify their response to the Covid-19 pandemic. ResultsWe have analyzed reported infected cases from each one of the 50 USA states and the District of Columbia, based on the multiple-wave model, and present the relevant parameters. Multiple waves have been identified and this model is found to describe the data better. Each of the states can be classified into one of three distinct classes characterized by declining, increasing, or stationary strength of the waves following the initial one. The effectiveness of intervention measures can be inferred by the peak intensities of the waves, and states with similar population characteristics can be directly compared. We estimate how much lower the number of infections might have been, if early and strict intervention measures had been imposed to stop the disease spread at the first wave, as was the case for certain states. Based on our models results, we compute the value of the Pandemic Response Index, a recently introduced metric for quantifying in an objective manner the response to the pandemic. ConclusionsOur results reveal a series of epidemic waves, characterizing USAs pandemic response at the state level, and also infer to what extent the imposition of early intervention measures could have had on the spread and impact of the disease. As of June 11, 2020, only 19 states and the District of Columbia (40% of the total) clearly exhibit declining trends in the numbers of reported infected cases, while 13 states exhibit stationary and 18 states increasing trends in the numbers of reported cases.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Incorporating the mutational landscape of SARS-COV-2 variants and case-dependent vaccination rates into epidemic models 94%
- Will Vaccine-derived Protective Immunity Curtail COVID-19 Variants in the US? 94%
- Impact of School Reopening on Pandemic Spread: A Case Study using an Agent-Based Model for COVID-19 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Recursive Bifurcation Model for Predicting the Peak of COVID-19 Virus Spread in United States and Germany 94%
- Model Based Estimation of the SARS-CoV-2 Immunization Level in Austria and Consequences for Herd Immunity Effects 94%
- Extended compartmental model for modeling COVID-19 epidemic in Slovenia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Underreporting and its Impact on Vaccination Strategies 94%
- Estimating effects of intervention measures on COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan taking account of improving diagnostic capabilities using a modelling approach 92%
- Mobility was a Significant Determinant of Reported COVID-19 Incidence During the Omicron Surge in the Most Populous U.S. Counties 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using an Agent-Based Model to Assess K-12 School Reopenings Under Different COVID-19 Spread Scenarios – United States, School Year 2020/21 94%
- Projection of Healthcare Demand in Germany and Switzerland Urged by Omicron Wave (January-March 2022) 94%
- Rational evaluation of various epidemic models based on the COVID-19 data of China 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.