Factors associated with self-reported anxiety, depression, and general health during the UK lockdown; a cross-sectional survey
Smith, L. E.; Amlot, R.; Lambert, H.; Oliver, I.; Robin, C.; Yardley, L.; Rubin, G. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundTo investigate factors associated with anxiety, depression, and self-reported general health during "lockdown" due to COVID-19 in the UK. MethodsOnline cross-sectional survey of a nationally-representative sample of 2240 participants living in the UK aged 18 years or over (data collected 6-7 May 2020). Participants were recruited from YouGovs online research panel. OutcomesIn this sample, 21{middle dot}9% (n=458, 95% CI [20{middle dot}1% to 23{middle dot}7%]) reported probable anxiety (scored three or over on the GAD-2); while 23{middle dot}5% (n=494, 95% CI [21{middle dot}7% to 25{middle dot}3]) reported probable depression (scored three or over on the PHQ-2). Poorer mental health was associated with greater financial hardship during the lockdown, thinking that you would lose contact with friends or family if you followed Government measures, more conflict with household members during the lockdown, less sense of community with people in your neighbourhood, and lower perceived effectiveness of Government measures. Females and those who were younger were likely to report higher levels of anxiety and depression. The majority of participants reported their general health as "good" (as measured by the first item of the SF-36). Poorer self-reported general health was associated with psychological distress, greater worry about COVID-19 and markers of inequality. InterpretationRates of self-reported anxiety and depression in the UK during the lockdown were greater than population norms. Reducing financial hardship, promoting social connectedness, and increasing solidarity with neighbours and household members may help ease rifts within the community which are associated with distress, thereby improving mental health. Reducing inequality may also improve general health. RESEARCH IN CONTEXTO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSO_LIQuarantine is associated with adverse psychological outcomes. C_LIO_LIPsychological distress during quarantine is associated with greater financial loss, greater perceived susceptibility to and severity of the illness, and greater frustration and boredom during quarantine. C_LIO_LIMeasures put in place to prevent the spread of COVID-19 have highlighted existing inequalities in society, disproportionally affecting younger people, those in lower-income households, and Black and minority ethnic groups. C_LIO_LIResearch in the UK and other countries indicates that rates of anxiety and depression during restrictions of movement such as "lockdown" measures are higher than population norms. C_LI Added value of this studyO_LIIn this study, 22% of the sample reported anxiety, while 24% reported depression. Normative data indicate that these rates are usually approximately 5% and 7% respectively. C_LIO_LIFactors associated with psychological distress included greater financial hardship, poorer social connectedness, greater conflict within the household and the wider neighbourhood, being female and of younger age. C_LIO_LISelf-reported general health in the sample was "good" on average. Factors associated with poorer self-reported general health included markers of inequality and greater worry about COVID-19. C_LI Implications of all the available evidenceO_LIDecreasing the financial impact of measures put in place to prevent the spread of COVID-19 may help improve mental health. C_LIO_LIInterventions promoting social connectedness in isolated young people and measures that increase household and neighbourhood solidarity may help improve mental health. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- “When will this end? Will it end?” The impact of the March-June 2020 UK Covid-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study 94%
- Mental health in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: early observations 93%
- Perceptions and behavioural responses of the general public during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey of UK Adults 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Did social factors buffer against the effect of adversities on self-harm during the COVID-19 pandemic? A longitudinal analysis of 49,227 UK adults 94%
- The prevalence, incidence, prognosis and risk factors for depression and anxiety in a UK cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- The impact of the COVID19 pandemic and initial period of lockdown on the mental health and wellbeing of UK adults 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining the association between family status and depression in the UK Biobank 93%
- Is Google Trends a useful tool for tracking mental and social distress during a public health emergency? A time-series analysis 92%
- Self-harm during the early period of the COVID-19 Pandemic in England: comparative trend analysis of hospital presentations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The mental health impact of COVID-19 and pandemic related stressors among adults in the UK 94%
- Tracking the mental health of home-carers during the first COVID-19 national lockdown: evidence from a nationally representative UK survey 94%
- Longitudinal changes in home confinement and mental health implications: A 17-month follow-up study in England during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of COVID-19 employment disruption with mental and social wellbeing: evidence from nine UK longitudinal studies 94%
- Loneliness during strict lockdown: trajectories and predictors during the COVID-19 pandemic in 38,217 adults in the UK 94%
- COVID-19, economic downturn, and long-term trajectories of population mental health: evidence from two nationally representative British birth cohorts at the intersection of gender and socioeconomic position 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.