Back

Factors associated with self-reported anxiety, depression, and general health during the UK lockdown; a cross-sectional survey

Smith, L. E.; Amlot, R.; Lambert, H.; Oliver, I.; Robin, C.; Yardley, L.; Rubin, G. J.

2020-06-23 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2020.06.23.20137901 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTo investigate factors associated with anxiety, depression, and self-reported general health during "lockdown" due to COVID-19 in the UK. MethodsOnline cross-sectional survey of a nationally-representative sample of 2240 participants living in the UK aged 18 years or over (data collected 6-7 May 2020). Participants were recruited from YouGovs online research panel. OutcomesIn this sample, 21{middle dot}9% (n=458, 95% CI [20{middle dot}1% to 23{middle dot}7%]) reported probable anxiety (scored three or over on the GAD-2); while 23{middle dot}5% (n=494, 95% CI [21{middle dot}7% to 25{middle dot}3]) reported probable depression (scored three or over on the PHQ-2). Poorer mental health was associated with greater financial hardship during the lockdown, thinking that you would lose contact with friends or family if you followed Government measures, more conflict with household members during the lockdown, less sense of community with people in your neighbourhood, and lower perceived effectiveness of Government measures. Females and those who were younger were likely to report higher levels of anxiety and depression. The majority of participants reported their general health as "good" (as measured by the first item of the SF-36). Poorer self-reported general health was associated with psychological distress, greater worry about COVID-19 and markers of inequality. InterpretationRates of self-reported anxiety and depression in the UK during the lockdown were greater than population norms. Reducing financial hardship, promoting social connectedness, and increasing solidarity with neighbours and household members may help ease rifts within the community which are associated with distress, thereby improving mental health. Reducing inequality may also improve general health. RESEARCH IN CONTEXTO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSO_LIQuarantine is associated with adverse psychological outcomes. C_LIO_LIPsychological distress during quarantine is associated with greater financial loss, greater perceived susceptibility to and severity of the illness, and greater frustration and boredom during quarantine. C_LIO_LIMeasures put in place to prevent the spread of COVID-19 have highlighted existing inequalities in society, disproportionally affecting younger people, those in lower-income households, and Black and minority ethnic groups. C_LIO_LIResearch in the UK and other countries indicates that rates of anxiety and depression during restrictions of movement such as "lockdown" measures are higher than population norms. C_LI Added value of this studyO_LIIn this study, 22% of the sample reported anxiety, while 24% reported depression. Normative data indicate that these rates are usually approximately 5% and 7% respectively. C_LIO_LIFactors associated with psychological distress included greater financial hardship, poorer social connectedness, greater conflict within the household and the wider neighbourhood, being female and of younger age. C_LIO_LISelf-reported general health in the sample was "good" on average. Factors associated with poorer self-reported general health included markers of inequality and greater worry about COVID-19. C_LI Implications of all the available evidenceO_LIDecreasing the financial impact of measures put in place to prevent the spread of COVID-19 may help improve mental health. C_LIO_LIInterventions promoting social connectedness in isolated young people and measures that increase household and neighbourhood solidarity may help improve mental health. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
26.2%
2
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
3
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
5
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
7
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
8
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
10
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
23
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%