Back

Healthcare workers experiences of working on the frontline and views about support during COVID-19 and comparable pandemics: A rapid review and meta-synthesis

Billings, J.; Ching, B. C. F.; Gkofa, V.; Greene, T.; Bloomfield, M.

2020-06-23 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2020.06.21.20136705
Show abstract

Healthcare workers across the world have risen to the demands of treating COVID-19 patients, potentially at significant cost to their own health and wellbeing. There has been increasing recognition of the potential mental health impact of COVID-19 on frontline healthcare workers and growing calls to provide psychosocial support for them. However, little attention has so far been paid to understanding the impact of working on a pandemic from healthcare workers own perspectives or what their views are about support. This rapid review identified 40 qualitative studies which have explored healthcare workers experiences and views from previous pandemics, including and comparable to COVID-19. Meta-synthesis of this qualitative data using thematic analysis derived eight key themes which transcended pandemics, time, and geographical boundaries. This pandemic is not unprecedented; the themes that arose from previous pandemics were remarkably resonant with what we are hearing about the impact of COVID-19 globally today. We have an opportunity to learn from the lessons of these previous pandemics, mitigate the negative mental health impact of COVID-19 and support the longer-term wellbeing of the healthcare workforce worldwide.

Matching journals

1
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
#1
203× avg
2
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 40%
12.6%
3
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 12%
2.7× avg
4
Psychiatry Research
Elsevier BV · based on 33 published papers
Top 0.9%
28× avg
5
BJPsych Open
Royal College of Psychiatrists · based on 24 published papers
Top 0.3%
54× avg
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MDPI AG · based on 116 published papers
Top 5%
5.4× avg
7
BMC Health Services Research
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 43 published papers
Top 0.9%
22× avg
8
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Royal College of Psychiatrists · based on 21 published papers
Top 0.9%
22× avg
9
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 135 published papers
Top 10%
2.9× avg
10
BMC Psychiatry
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 20 published papers
Top 0.5%
34× avg
11
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers Media SA · based on 56 published papers
Top 4%
7.4× avg
12
Public Health
Elsevier BV · based on 34 published papers
Top 1%
11× avg
13
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 7%
3.4× avg
14
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.5%
28× avg
15
BMJ Mental Health
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
Top 1%
22× avg
16
Journal of Affective Disorders
Elsevier BV · based on 72 published papers
Top 5%
3.3× avg
17
Psychological Medicine
Cambridge University Press (CUP) · based on 52 published papers
Top 5%
4.1× avg
18
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 31 published papers
Top 4%
5.6× avg
19
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
14× avg
20
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Elsevier BV · based on 22 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
21
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Cambridge University Press (CUP) · based on 10 published papers
Top 1%
14× avg
22
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Elsevier BV · based on 35 published papers
Top 3%
5.1× avg
23
eClinicalMedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 55 published papers
Top 7%
3.2× avg
24
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 19 published papers
Top 4%
4.4× avg
25
Frontiers in Digital Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 5%
4.9× avg