A systematic review and meta-analysis reveals long and dispersive incubation period of COVID-19
Wei, Y.; Wei, L.; Liu, Y.; Huang, L.; Shen, S.; Zhang, R.; Chen, J.; Zhao, Y.; Shen, H.; Chen, F.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe incubation period of SARS-CoV-2 remains uncertain, which has important implications for estimating transmission potential, forecasting epidemic trends, and decision-making in prevention and control. PurposeTo estimate the central tendency and dispersion for incubation period of COVID-19 and, in turn, assess the effect of a certain length of quarantine for close contacts in active monitoring. Data SourcesPubMed, Embase, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and arXiv, searched up to April 26, 2020 Study SelectionCOVID-19 studies that described either individual-level incubation period data or summarized statistics for central tendency and dispersion measures of incubation period were recruited. Data ExtractionFrom each recruited study, either individual-level incubation period data or summarized statistics for central tendency and dispersion measures were extracted, as well as population characteristics including sample size, average age, and male proportion. Data SynthesisFifty-six studies encompassing 4 095 cases were included in this meta-analysis. The estimated median incubation period for general transmissions was 5.8 days [95% confidence interval (95%CI), 5.3 to 6.2 d]. Median and dispersion were higher for SARS-CoV-2 incubation compared to other viral respiratory infections. Furthermore, about 20 in 10 000 contacts in active monitoring would develop symptoms after 14 days, or below 1 in 10 000 for young-age infections or asymptomatic transmissions. LimitationSmall sample sizes for subgroups; some data were possibly used repeatedly in different studies; limited studies for outside mainland China; non-negligible intra-study heterogeneity. ConclusionThe long, dispersive incubation period of SARS-CoV-2 contributes to the global spread of COVID-19. Yet, a 14-day quarantine period is sufficient to trace and identify symptomatic infections, which while could be justified according to a better understanding of the crucial parameters.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolving epidemiology of novel coronavirus diseases 2019 and possible interruption of local transmission outside Hubei Province in China: a descriptive and modeling study 92%
- Epidemiology and Transmission of COVID-19 in Shenzhen China: Analysis of 391 cases and 1,286 of their close contacts 91%
- Marburg Virus Disease outbreaks, mathematical models, and disease parameters: a Systematic Review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Long-Term Impact of COVID-19 Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions on Notifiable Infectious Diseases in Poland: A Comprehensive Analysis from 2014-2022 92%
- Estimates of epidemiological parameters for H5N1 influenza in humans: a rapid review 90%
- Nasopharyngeal Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) Expression as a Risk-Factor for SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in Concurrent Hospital Associated Outbreaks 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Extending influenza surveillance to detect non-influenza respiratory viruses of public health relevance: analysis of surveillance data, 2015-2019, Belgium 92%
- The incubation period of 2019-nCoV infections among travellers from Wuhan, China 91%
- Facemasks and similar barriers to prevent respiratory illness such asCOVID-19: A rapid systematic review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Interactions among common non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viruses and influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on their circulation in New York City 91%
- Adherence of SARS-CoV-2 seroepidemiologic studies to the ROSES-S reporting guideline during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
- Health seeking behaviors of patients with acute respiratory infections during the outbreak of novel coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.