Simultaneously monitoring aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity using riverine water eDNA: seasonal variation of monitoring effectiveness
YANG, H.; DU, H.; QI, H.; YU, L.; HOU, X.; ZHANG, H.; LI, J.; WU, J.; WANG, C.; ZHOU, Q.; WEI, Q.
Show abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding for biodiversity monitoring is a critical technical advance. Both aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity information can be detected in riverine water eDNA. However, it remains unverified whether riverine water eDNA can be used to simultaneously monitor aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity. Our specific objective was to assess the effectiveness of monitoring aquatic and riparian biodiversity using riverine water eDNA. We proposed that the monitoring effectiveness (the proportion of aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity information detected by riverine water eDNA samples) could be approximated by the transportation effectiveness of land-to-river and upstream-to-downstream biodiversity information flow. We conducted a case study in a watershed on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and estimated the effectiveness of using riverine water eDNA to monitor aquatic and riparian biodiversity based on comparing the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and species assemblages of three taxonomic communities detected in riverine water eDNA samples and riparian soil eDNA samples in spring, summer, and autumn. The aquatic and riparian biodiversity of a watershed on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau could be simultaneously effectively monitored using riverine water eDNA on summer or autumn rainy days. Monitoring bacterial communities was more efficient than monitoring eukaryotic communities. On summer rainy days, 43%-76% of riparian species could be detected in water eDNA samples, 92%-99% of upstream species could be detected in a 1-km downstream eDNA sample, and more than 50% of dead bioinformation (i.e., the bioinformation labeling the biological material without life activity and fertility) could be monitored 4-6 km downstream for eukaryotes and 13-19 km for bacteria. We encourage more studies on the monitoring effectiveness for each taxonomic community in other watersheds with different environmental conditions. We believe that in future ecological research, conservation and management, we could efficiently monitor and assess the aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity by simply using riverine water eDNA samples.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- QT-AMP: Quanti-Tray-based amplicon sequencing for simultaneous quantification and identification of enterococci for microbial source tracking 96%
- The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in different freshwater environments in urban settings determined by RT-qPCR: implications for water safety 96%
- Tracking SARS-CoV-2 in rivers as a tool for epidemiological surveillance 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in the genetic structure between and within two landlocked Ayu groups with different migration patterns in Lake Biwa revealed by environmental DNA analysis 96%
- Applying environmental DNA metabarcoding to calculate an index of biotic integrity for freshwater fish 96%
- Degradation modeling of water environmental DNA: Experiments on multiple DNA sources in pond and seawater 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial Heterogeneity of Microbial Community Structure and Its Environmental Drivers in Surface Sediments of Erhai Lake 97%
- Evaluation of biodiversity in estuaries using environmental DNA metabarcoding 95%
- Defining the sediment microbiome of the Indian River Lagoon, FL, USA, an Estuary of National Significance 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of Environmental Factors Associated with Antibiotic Resistance Genes (ARGs) in the Yangtze Delta, China 96%
- Grazing pressure-induced shift in planktonic bacterial communities with the dominance of acIII-A1 actinobacterial lineage in soda pans 95%
- Distinct microbial communities along the chronic oil pollution continuum of the Persian Gulf converge with oil spill accidents 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.