An in-silico based clinical insight on the effect of noticeable CD4 conserved residues of SARS-CoV-2 on the CD4-MHC-I interactions
Chellasamy, S.; Arun Kumar, S.; Dasgupta, D.; Wei, H.
Show abstract
The study is aimed to unveil the conserved residues of CD4 in the context of its purposeful interaction with MHC-II at the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 compared with the envelope (Env) glycoprotein (gp) 120 of HIV-1. The paired CD4 conserved residues, including the matched CD4 interacting MHC-II epitopes of the structural viral protein domains, were chosen for the protein modelling using the SWISS-MODEL online server. Energy minimization and structural validation of the modelled viral protein domains, including the CD4 and MHC-II protein were achieved by CHIMERA and PROCHECK-Ramachandran Plot respectively. Protein-protein docking was performed by the HADDOCK online tool. The binding affinity score was measured using the PRODIGY online server. As per our docking report, the Env gp120 of HIV-1 with three identical and three conserved residues of CD4 exhibited the highest binding affinity (-13.9 kcal/mol) with MHC-II than the second-highest RBD-S1-SARS-CoV-2 (-12.5 kcal/mol) with three identical and a single conserved residue of CD4. With a noticeable single salt bridge formation identified at the interacting residues Lys305 (of Env gp120-HIV-1) and Glu139 (of MHC-II); the Env gp120 interaction with MHC-II occupied the crucial His144 and Glu194 (salt-bridge) interacting residues of CD4 with the measured buried surface area 2554.8{+/-}40.8 [A]2. Similarly, the RBD-S1-SARS-CoV-2-MHC-II complex showed two salt bridge formations at the residue sites: 1) Arg567 (of SARS-CoV-2)-Glu194 (of MHC-II) 2) 2) Asp568(of SARS-CoV-2)-Arg165 (of MHC-II) with the increased buried surface area of 1910.9{+/-}97.1 [A]2 over the SARS-CoV score 1708.2{+/-}50.8 [A]2; that camouflaged all crucial CD4 interacting residues of MHC-II. In conclusion, the noticeable conserved residues of CD4 at the RBD-S1 sites of SARS-CoV-2 could interrupt the aspired CD4-MHC-II interactions of adaptive immune activation.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- iBRAB: in silico based-designed Broad-spectrum Fab against H1N1 Influenza A Virus 97%
- SARS-CoV-2: Proof of recombination between strains and emergence of possibly more virulent ones 97%
- Immuno-informatics Design of a Multimeric Epitope Peptide Based Vaccine Targeting SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- An insight into SARS-CoV-2 Membrane protein interaction with Spike, Envelope, and Nucleocapsid proteins 98%
- Ab initio modelling of an essential mammalian protein: Transcription Termination Factor 1 (TTF1) 97%
- Insights into the microevolution of SARS-ACE2 Interactions: In-silico analysis of glycosylation and SNP pattern 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Omicron (BA.1) and Sub-Variants (BA.1, BA.2 and BA.3) of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Infectivity and Pathogenicity: A Comparative Sequence and Structural-based Computational Assessment 97%
- Omicron and Delta Variant of SARS-CoV-2: A Comparative Computational Study of Spike protein 97%
- Effects of SARS-CoV-2 Mutations on Protein Structures and Intraviral Protein-Protein Interactions 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel Peptide Inhibitor of Human Tumor Necrosis Factor-α has Antiarthritic Activity 96%
- In Silico Analysis Predicting Effects of Deleterious SNPs of Human RASSF5 Gene on its Structure and Functions 96%
- Mechanistic insights into the deleterious role of nasu-hakola disease associated TREM2 variants 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Computational analysis of the adaptability of H9N2 avian influenza virus: A comparative docking simulation study 97%
- Interaction of the spike protein RBD from SARS-CoV-2 with ACE2: similarity with SARS-CoV, hot-spot analysis and effect of the receptor polymorphism 97%
- Scanning the RBD-ACE2 molecular interactions in Omicron variant 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.