Back

Diagnostic accuracy of six commercial SARS-CoV-2 IgG/total antibody assays and identification of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies in convalescent sera

Stroemer, A.; Grobe, O.; Rose, R.; Fickenscher, H.; Lorentz, T.; Krumbholz, A.

2020-06-17 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.06.15.20131672 medRxiv
Show abstract

The reliable detection of immunoglobulin G (IgG) or total antibodies directed against the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is important for clinical diagnostics and epidemiological studies. Here, we compare the diagnostic accuracy of six commercially available SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG; Diasorin Liaison(R) SARS-CoV-2 S1/2 IgG; Epitope EDI Novel Coronavirus COVID-19 IgG ELISA Kit; Euroimmun Anti-SARS-CoV-2 ELISA (IgG); Mikrogen recomWell SARS-CoV-2 IgG) or total SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays (Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2). The test sensitivities were analyzed with a set of 34 sera obtained from 26 patients after PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and varied from 76.9% (Euroimmun) to 96.2% (Abbott). The majority of assay results were confirmed in a laboratory-developed plaque reduction neutralization test and by a SARS-CoV-2 IgG-specific line assay including measurement of generally low IgG avidities (Mikrogen recomLine Coronavirus IgG [Aviditat], prototype). Moreover, 100 stored sera collected during summer 2018 (N = 50) and winter season 2018/2019 (N = 50) were included to demonstrate test specificities. These varied from 96.0% (DiaSorin) to 100% (Epitope EDI). A subset of sera were retested with a lateral flow test (STANDARD Q COVID-19 IgM/IgG Duo) and a considerably lower sensitivity was noted. Overall, the diagnostic accuracy of the six SARS-CoV-2 IgG/total antibody assays was good and varied from 92.9% (Euroimmun) to 98.4% (Abbott). Due to the different specificities, results of commercially available SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests should be interpreted with caution. A high proportion of antibody-positive patient sera demonstrated neutralizing capacity against SARS-CoV-2.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.