Back

Miniaturized Devices for Bioluminescence Imaging in Freely Behaving Animals

Celinskis, D.; Friedman, N.; Koksharov, M.; Murphy, J.; Gomez-Ramirez, M.; Borton, D.; Shaner, N.; Hochgeschwender, U.; Lipscombe, D.; Moore, C.

2020-06-16 bioengineering Community evaluation
10.1101/2020.06.15.152546 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fluorescence miniature microscopy in vivo has recently proven a major advance, enabling cellular imaging in freely behaving animals. However, fluorescence imaging suffers from autofluorescence, phototoxicity, photobleaching and non-homogeneous illumination artifacts. These factors limit the quality and time course of data collection. Bioluminescence provides an alternative kind of activity-dependent light indicator. Bioluminescent calcium indicators do not require light input, instead generating photons through chemiluminescence. As such, limitations inherent to the requirement for light presentation are eliminated. Further, bioluminescent indicators also do not require excitation light optics: the removal of this component should make lighter and lower cost microscope with fewer assembly parts. While there has been significant recent progress in making brighter and faster bioluminescence indicators, parallel advances in imaging hardware have not yet been realized. A hardware challenge is that despite potentially higher signal-to-noise of bioluminescence, the signal strength is lower than that of fluorescence. An open question we address in this report is whether fluorescent miniature microscopes can be rendered sensitive enough to detect bioluminescence. We demonstrate this possibility in vitro and in vivo by implementing optimizations of the UCLA fluorescent miniscope. These optimizations yielded a miniscope (BLmini) which is 22% lighter in weight, has 45% fewer components, is up to 58% less expensive, offers up to 15 times stronger signal (as dichroic filtering is not required) and is sensitive enough to capture spatiotemporal dynamics of bioluminescence in the brain with a signal-to-noise ratio of 34 dB.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.3%
4
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
9
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
10
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
11
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
Optics Letters
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
ACS Photonics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
15
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
17
HardwareX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
19
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
27
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
28
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 49%
0.5%