Enhanced comparisons of COVID-19 mortality across populations
Rao, C.; Doi, S.; Williams, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe reported crude case fatality rate (CFR) for COVID-19 varies considerably across countries. Crude CFRs could by biased by larger proportions of older COVID-19 cases in population data, who are also at increased mortality risk. Such distorted age case structures are a common feature of selective COVID 19 testing strategies in many countries, and they potentially mask underlying differences arising from other important factors such as health system burden. MethodsWe used the method of direct case-age standardisation to evaluate the effects of age variations on CFRs. Data on cases and death by age from Italy, Spain, China, Australia and South Korea were analysed to derive standardised CFRs. Findings were compared across different case age distribution references as standards. ResultsUsing the South Korean case age distribution as a standard, the fivefold higher crude CFR for Italy is reduced to less than two-fold after adjustment, while the crude CFR difference for Spain is virtually eliminated. The adjusted CFR for Australia is the lowest among all countries. DiscussionMortality differences based on crude CFRs are exaggerated by age structures, which are effectively controlled by case age standardization. Residual CFR differences could be attributed to health and health system factors. The South Korean case age distribution is an appropriate reference standard, given its robust case detection and contact tracing program. Till reliable population level indicators of incidence and mortality are available, the age-standardized CFR could be a viable option for international comparison of the impact of the COVID 19 epidemic. SummaryO_ST_ABSThe knownC_ST_ABSThere are intense debates around the magnitude of and reasons for wide variations in observed case fatality rates (CFRs) from COVID 19 across countries. Age is commonly speculated as a reason, but this has not been technically quantified or explained. The newThe technique of direct standardization using reference distributions of case age structures eliminates the effects of age on CFR, thus enhancing the comparability as well as understanding of differentials The implicationsResidual differences between adjusted CFRs can be used to infer health and health system factors that influence mortality in COVID 19 cases in different populations
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Monitoring trends and differences in COVID-19 case fatality rates using decomposition methods: Contributions of age structure and age-specific fatality 92%
- The confounded crude case-fatality rates for COVID-19 hide more than they reveal - a comparison of age-specific and age-adjusted rates between six countries 92%
- A First Analysis of Excess Mortality in Switzerland in 2020 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Beyond Deaths per Capita: Comparative CoViD-19 Mortality Indicators 93%
- Recent adverse mortality trends in Scotland: comparison with other high-income countries. 93%
- Lockdown and non-COVID-19 deaths: Cause-specific mortality during the first wave of the 2020 pandemic in Norway. A population-based register study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Excess respiratory, circulatory, neoplasm and other mortality rates during the Covid-19 pandemic in the EU and their implications 92%
- Lockdown measures and relative changes in the age-specific incidence of SARS-CoV-2 in Spain 92%
- Correlation of population mortality of COVID-19 and testing coverage: a comparison among 36 OECD countries and Taiwan 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- US Exceptionalism? International Trends in Midlife Mortality 91%
- Education-related inequalities in cause-specific mortality: First estimates for Australia using individual-level linked census and mortality data 91%
- Data Resource Profile: Understanding the patterns and determinants of health in South Asians - South Asia Biobank 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnic differences in COVID-19 mortality during the first two waves of the Coronavirus Pandemic: a nationwide cohort study of 29 million adults in England 92%
- Different approaches to quantify years of life lost from COVID-19 91%
- Differential risk of healthcare workers versus the general population during outbreak, war and pandemic crises 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.