Back

Assessing the burden of COVID-19 in Canada

Bignami, S.; Van Assche, A.

2020-06-16 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.06.14.20130815 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe burden of COVID-19 in Canada is unequally distributed geographically, with the largest number of cases and fatalities recorded in Quebec and Ontario while other provinces experienced limited outbreaks. To date, however, no study has assessed how provincial epidemics have unfolded in a comparative perspective. This is essential to calibrate projections of the future course of the epidemic and plan health care resources for the second wave of infections. MethodsUsing newly released individual-level data collected by the Public Health Agency of Canada, we assess COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality across age and gender groups at the provincial level through a combination of demographic and survival analyses. ResultsQuebec has the highest absolute and per capita number of COVID-19 confirmed positive cases, hospitalizations and fatalities in all age groups. In each province, a higher number of women than men test positive for the disease, especially above age 80. Yet consistently across age groups, infected men are more likely to be hospitalized and enter intensive care than women do. These gender differences in hospitalisation rates account for the higher case fatality risk due to COVID-19 among men compared to women. InterpretationAlthough health care capacity across provinces has been sufficient to treat severe cases, we find that the main factor accounting for gender differences in COVID-19-related mortality is the need for hospitalization and intensive care, especially above age 80. This suggests a selection effect of severe cases requiring to be treated in a hospital setting that needs to be further investigated.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.1%
2
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.9%
4
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
5
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
8
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.5%
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
12
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
14
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
19
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
21
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
22
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
25
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
28
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%