Back

ARB/ACEI use and severe COVID-19: a nationwide case-control study

Choi, H. K.; Koo, H.-J.; Seok, H.; Jeon, J. H.; Choi, W. S.; Kim, D. J.; Park, D. W.; Han, E.

2020-06-13 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.06.12.20129916 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAngiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) have anti-inflammatory effects. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) uses the membrane protein angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which is increased by ARB/ACEI treatment, as a cell entry receptor. Therefore, the use of ARBs/ACEIs for COVID-19 remains controversial. MethodsA retrospective case-control study was conducted using COVID-19 patients previously diagnosed with hypertension before COVID-19 onset. The primary outcome was severe infection or all-cause mortality. Cases included ARB/ACEI use for [≥]30 days during the 6 months before COVID-19 onset. Primary controls included antihypertensive use other than ARBs/ACEIs (narrow control); secondary controls included all other hypertension patients (broad control). We investigated ARB/ACEI association with outcomes in general and by subgroups (age, sex, and presence of diabetes) using logistic regression models with propensity score matching. FindingsOf 234427 suspected COVID-19 patients we screened, 1585 hypertension patients were analyzed. In the 892 cases, 428 narrow controls, and 693 broad controls, severe infection or death occurred in 8{middle dot}6%, 22{middle dot}2%, and 16{middle dot}7%, respectively. ARB/ACEI use was associated with a reduced risk of severe infection or death relative to the narrow control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0{middle dot}43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0{middle dot}28 - 0{middle dot}65) and broad control group (aOR 0{middle dot}49, 95% CI 0{middle dot}33 - 0{middle dot}71). The association was smaller for newly diagnosed hypertension patients (aOR 0{middle dot}11, 95% CI 0{middle dot}03 - 0{middle dot}42 compared to narrow control group). ARB/ACEI protective effects against severe infection or death were significantly observed in male and diabetic patients. InterpretationARB/ACEI use was associated with a lower risk of severe infection or mortality compared to other antihypertensives or ARB/ACEI nonuse. FundingNone Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSAnimal studies reported that ACE2 attenuates lung injury and provides a protective effect against severe pneumonia. Additionally, retrospective studies found that ARBs/ACEIs may have beneficial effects on ARDS patient survival. Previous observational studies have reported no potential harmful association of either ARBs or ACEIs with COVID-19 outcomes. Added value of this studyBy analyzing nationwide claims data in South Korea, we found that previous use of ARB/ACEI was associated with improved outcomes in COVID-19 compared with either nonuse or use of a different class of antihypertensive drugs. The risk of severe infection or death was consistently about 55% lower in those treated with ARB/ACEIs than those who were not exposed to ARB/ACEIs. The protective effect of ARB/ACEI was remained significantly among the male subgroup and patients with diabetes. This association was also observed among COVID-19 patients with newly diagnosed hypertension. Implications of all the available evidenceThese results provide supporting evidence for the continued use of ARBs/ACEIs among patients with COVID-19. Moreover, for newly diagnosed hypertension patients, initiation of ARB/ACEI use may not adversely affect COVID-19 prognosis. Given the poor prognosis of COVID-19 patients with hypertension and lack of curable strategy, these findings may have considerable clinical implications in prevention of poor outcome in patients with hypertension.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.