Back

Healthcare Worker COVID-19 Cases in Ontario, Canada: A Cross-sectional Study

Schwartz, K. L.; Achonu, C.; Buchan, S. A.; Brown, K. A.; Lee, B.; Whelan, M.; Wu, J. H.; Garber, G.

2020-06-14 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.06.12.20129619 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceProtecting healthcare workers (HCWs) from COVID-19 is a priority to maintain a safe and functioning healthcare system. The risk of transmitting COVID-19 to family members is a source of stress for many. ObjectiveTo describe and compare HCW and non-HCW COVID-19 cases in Ontario, Canada, as well as the frequency of COVID-19 among HCWs household members. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsUsing reportable disease data at Public Health Ontario which captures all COVID-19 cases in Ontario, Canada, we conducted a population-based cross-sectional study comparing demographic, exposure, and clinical variables between HCWs and non-HCWs with COVID-19 as of 14 May 2020. We calculated rates of infections over time and determined the frequency of within household transmissions using natural language processing based on residential address. Exposures and OutcomesWe contrasted age, gender, comorbidities, clinical presentation (including asymptomatic and presymptomatic), exposure histories including nosocomial transmission, and clinical outcomes between HCWs and non-HCWs with confirmed COVID-19. ResultsThere were 4,230 (17.5%) HCW COVID-19 cases in Ontario, of whom 20.2% were nurses, 2.3% were physicians, and the remaining 77.4% other specialties. HCWs were more likely to be between 30-60 years of age and female. HCWs were more likely to present asymptomatically (8.1% versus 7.0%, p=0.010) or with atypical symptoms (17.8% versus 10.5%, p<0.001). The mortality among HCWs was 0.2% compared to 10.5% of non-HCWs. HCWs commonly had exposures to a confirmed case or outbreak (74.1%), however only 3.1% were confirmed to be nosocomial. The rate of new infections was 5.5 times higher in HCWs than non-HCWs, but mirrored the epidemic curve. We identified 391 (9.8%) probable secondary household transmissions and 143 (3.6%) acquisitions. Children < 19 years comprised 14.6% of secondary cases compared to only 4.2% of the primary cases. Conclusions and RelevanceHCWs represent a disproportionate number of COVID-19 cases in Ontario but with low confirmed numbers of nosocomial transmission. The data support substantial testing bias and under-ascertainment of general population cases. Protecting HCWs through appropriate personal protective equipment and physical distancing from colleagues is paramount. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat are the differences between healthcare workers and non-healthcare workers with COVID-19? FindingsIn this population-based cross-sectional study there were 4,230 healthcare workers comprising 17.5% of COVID-19 cases. Healthcare workers were diagnosed with COVID-19 at a rate 5.5 times higher than the general population with 0.8% of all healthcare workers, compared to 0.1% of non-healthcare workers. MeaningHigh healthcare worker COVID-19 burden highlights the importance of physical distancing from colleagues, appropriate personal protective equipment, as well as likely substantial testing bias and under-ascertainment of COVID-19 in the general population.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.3%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
3
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
7
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
8
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
12
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
13
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
18
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.7%
29
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
30
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%