Evaluation of 30-day mortality for 500 patients undergoing non-emergency surgery in a COVID-19 cold site within a multicentre regional surgical network during the COVID-19 pandemic
Kasivisvanathan, V.; Lindsay, J.; Rakhshani-moghadam, S.; Elhamshary, A.; Kapriniotis, K.; Kazantzis, G.; Syed, B.; Hines, J.; Bex, A.; Heffernan Ho, D.; Hayward, M.; Bhan, C.; MacDonald, N.; Clarke, S.; Walker, D.; Bellingan, G.; Moore, J.; Rohn, J.; Muneer, A.; Roberts, L.; Haddad, F.; Kelly, J. D.
Show abstract
BackgroundTwo million non-emergency surgeries are being cancelled globally every week due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which will have a major impact on patients and healthcare systems. ObjectiveTo determine whether it is feasible and safe to continue non-emergency surgery in the COVID-19 pandemic Design, setting and participantsThis is a cohort study of 500 consecutive patients undergoing non-emergency surgery in a dedicated COVID-19 cold site following the first case of COVID-19 that was reported in the institution. The study was carried out during the peak of the pandemic in the United Kingdom, which currently has one of the highest number of cases and deaths from COVID-19 globally. We set up a hub-and-spoke surgical network amongst 14 National Health Service institutions during the pandemic. The hub was a cancer centre, which was converted into a COVID-19 cold site, performing urological, thoracic, gynaecological and general surgical operations. OutcomesThe primary outcome was 30-day mortality from COVID-19. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and post-operative complications at 30-days. Results500 patients underwent surgery with median age 62.5 (IQR 51-71). 65% were male and 60% had a known diagnosis of cancer. 44% of surgeries were performed with robotic or laparoscopic assistance and 61% were considered complex or major operations. None of the 500 patients undergoing surgery died from COVID-19 at 30-days. 30-day allcause mortality was 3/500 (1%). 10 (2%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, 4 (1%) with confirmed laboratory diagnosis and 6 (1%) with probable COVID-19. 33/500 (7%) of patients developed Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher complications, with 1/33 (3%) occurring in a patient with COVID-19. ConclusionIt is safe to continue non-emergency surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic with appropriate service reconfiguration. Patient summaryNo patients died from COVID-19 when undergoing non-emergency surgery during the pandemic in one of the worst affected world regions.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgery & COVID-19: A rapid scoping review of the impact of COVID-19 on surgical services during public health emergencies 93%
- Prescribing patterns for medical treatment of suspected prostatic obstruction: A spatiotemporal statistical analysis of Scottish open access data 91%
- Risk factors for severe outcomes of COVID-19: a rapid review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unplanned Hospital Visits after Ambulatory Surgical Care 92%
- Study protocol for COvid-19 Vascular sERvice (COVER) study: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision, practice and outcomes of vascular surgery 91%
- An effect of the COVID-19 pandemic: significantly more complicated appendicitis due to delayed presentation of patients! 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of digital-enabled multidisciplinary therapy conferences on efficiency and quality of the decision making in prostate-cancer care 92%
- Impact of the Federated Data Platform's digital surgery scheduling system on elective theatre utilisation at an NHS Trust: an interrupted time series analysis 91%
- The performance of national COVID-19 ‘Symptom Checkers’: A comparative case simulation study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgical activity in England and Wales during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide observational cohort study 94%
- Mortality after surgery with SARS-CoV-2 infection in England: A population-wide epidemiological study 92%
- Preoperative predictions of in-hospital mortality using electronic medical record data 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of atypical intrahospital transfers on patient outcomes: a mixed methods study 90%
- Pan-cancer analyses of the associations between 109 pre-existing conditions and cancer treatment patterns across 19 adult cancers 90%
- An Observational Study of COVID-19 from A Large Healthcare System in Northern New Jersey: Diagnosis, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.