Back

Speeding up the detection of invasive aquatic species using environmental DNA and nanopore sequencing

Egeter, B.; Verissimo, J.; Lopes_Lima, M.; Chaves, C.; Pinto, J.; Riccardi, N.; Beja, P.; Fonseca, N. A.

2020-06-11 ecology
10.1101/2020.06.09.142521 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Traditional detection of aquatic invasive species, via morphological identification is often time-consuming and can require a high level of taxonomic expertise, leading to delayed mitigation responses. Environmental DNA (eDNA) detection approaches of multiple species using Illumina-based sequencing technology have been used to overcome these hindrances, but sample processing is often lengthy. More recently, portable nanopore sequencing technology has become available, which has the potential to make molecular detection of invasive species more widely accessible and to substantially decrease sample turnaround times. However, nanopore-sequenced reads have a much higher error rate than those produced by Illumina platforms, which has so far hindered the adoption of this technology. We provide a detailed laboratory protocol and bioinformatic tools to increase the reliability of nanopore sequencing to detect invasive species, and we test its application using invasive bivalves. We sampled water from sites with pre-existing bivalve occurrence and abundance data, and contrasting bivalve communities, in Italy and Portugal. We extracted, amplified and sequenced eDNA with a turnaround of 3.5 days. The majority of processed reads were [≥] 99 % identical to reference sequences. There were no taxa detected other than those known to occur. The lack of detections of some species at some sites could be explained by their known low abundances. This is the first reported use of MinION to detect aquatic invasive species from eDNA samples. The approach can be easily adapted for other metabarcoding applications, such as biodiversity assessment, ecosystem health assessment and diet studies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.4%
2
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
6
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
8
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
10
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
17
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
20
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
22
Freshwater Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
23
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
25
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%