Back

Is the psychological well-being of a population associated with COVID-19 related survival?

Feys, F.

2020-06-07 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.06.05.20123018 medRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWO_ST_ABSOBJECTIVEC_ST_ABSImmunological mind-body research suggests mental health may also be important in the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to investigate the potential influence of mental health as a protective factor for COVID-19 related mortality in the general population. The second goal was to examine this among populations of countries most affected by COVID-19 related mortality. METHODSData sources were the Global Burden of Disease report 2017 and publicly reported situational reports of COVID-19. We described variables; calculated the spearmans correlation coefficient, calculated the percentage of the variability of the data that is explained by the association. We explored inter-relationships among other variables: aged 70 or older, cardiovascular disease, obesity and diabetes. A correlation matrix with plotted scatter matrix diagrams was produced. RESULTSAcross 181 countries, the mean total COVID-19 related survivors per million was 999,949 (sd = 125), median = 999,993. The variable had a lognormal distribution; the mean mentally healthy per 100,000 was 85,411 (sd = 1,871), median = 85,634. The test of normality resulted in p-value < 0.001. Correlation of mentally healthy per 100,0000 and totals of COVID-19 related survivors was{varrho} s = 0.29 (n = 181, 95% CI 0.16-0.43). The variance explained by the relation between mental healthy and totals of COVID-19 related survivors was 8.4% (2.6-18.5%). Across countries most affected by COVID-19 related mortality{varrho} s = 0.49 (n = 45, 0.28-0.70), explaining 24.2% (7.7-49.3%). CONCLUSIONA weak association was found between the psychological well-being of a population and COVID-19 related survival. This relationship explained between 2.6 and 18.5% of COVID-19 related survival. For countries most affected by COVID-19 related death, this association was moderate and explained between 7.7 and 49.3%. Confirmation of these important observational findings is needed with future individual patient data research.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.