Back

Rapid implementation of SARS-CoV-2 emergency use authorization RT-PCR testing and experience at an academic medical institution

Velu, P.; Craney, A.; Ruggiero, P.; Sipley, J.; Cong, L.; Hissong, E.; Loda, M.; Westblade, L. F.; Cushing, M.; Rennert, H.

2020-06-08 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.06.05.20109637
Show abstract

An epidemic caused by an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in China in December 2019 has since rapidly spread internationally, requiring urgent response from the clinical diagnostics community. We present a detailed overview of the clinical validation and implementation of the first laboratory-developed real-time reverse-transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) test offered in the NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital system following the emergency use authority (EUA) guidance issued by the US Food and Drug Administration. Validation was performed on nasopharyngeal and sputum specimens (n=124) using newly designed dual-target rRT-PCR (altona RealStar(R) SARS-CoV-2 Reagent) for detecting of SARS-CoV-2 in upper respiratory and lower respiratory tract specimens, including bronchoalveolar lavage and tracheal aspirates. Accuracy testing demonstrated excellent assay agreement between expected and observed values. The limit of detection (LOD) was 2.7 and 23.0 gene copies/reaction for nasopharyngeal and sputum specimens, respectively. Retrospective analysis of 1,694 tests from 1,571 patients revealed increased positivity in older patients and males compared to females, and an increasing positivity rate from approximately 20% at the start of testing to 50% at the end of testing three weeks later. Our findings demonstrate that the assay accurately and sensitively identifies SARS-CoV-2 in multiple specimen types in the clinical setting and summarizes clinical data from early in the epidemic in New York City.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
based on 77 papers
Top 0.3%
16.2%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 27%
16.2%
3
Journal of Clinical Virology
based on 54 papers
Top 0.5%
4.7%
4
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 6%
4.7%
5
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 47%
3.1%
6
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 3%
3.1%
7
Journal of Virological Methods
based on 20 papers
Top 0.6%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 2%
3.0%
9
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 3%
3.0%
10
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
based on 14 papers
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
based on 15 papers
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
Clinical Chemistry
based on 14 papers
Top 0.5%
1.9%
13
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
based on 11 papers
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 5%
1.7%
15
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Microbiology Spectrum
based on 86 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
17
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
based on 54 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
19
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 7%
1.4%
20
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
21
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
based on 24 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 39%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 24%
0.8%
24
Journal of Clinical Virology Plus
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
0.8%
25
Journal of Medical Microbiology
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 20%
0.7%