Back

Adverse effects of COVID-19 related lockdown on pain, physical activity and psychological wellbeing in people with chronic pain

Fallon, N.; Brown, C.; Twiddy, H.; Brian, E.; Frank, B.; Nurmikko, T.; Stancak, A.

2020-06-05 pain medicine
10.1101/2020.06.04.20122564
Show abstract

Countries across the world imposed lockdown restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic. It has been proposed that lockdown conditions disproportionately impact those living with chronic pain, requiring adaptation to treatment and care strategies. We investigated how lockdown restrictions in the United Kingdom impacted individuals with chronic pain (N = 431) relative to a healthy control group (N = 88) using an online survey. In accordance with the fear-avoidance model, we hypothesised increases in perceived pain and psychological distress that would be mediated by pain catastrophizing. Survey questions answered during the lockdown period, probing patients self-perceived changes retrospectively, revealed that people with chronic pain perceived increases in their pain severity compared to before lockdown. They were also more adversely affected by lockdown compared to pain-free individuals, demonstrating greater increases in anxiety and depressed mood, increased loneliness and reduced levels of physical exercise. Pain catastrophizing was found to be an important factor in predicting the extent of self-perceived increases in pain, and accounted for the relationship between decreased mood and pain. Perceived decreases in levels of physical exercise also independently predicted perceptions of increased pain. Interestingly, actual changes in pain symptoms (measured at two time points at pre- and post-lockdown in a subgroup, N = 85) did not change significantly on average, but those reporting increases also demonstrated greater baseline levels of pain catastrophizing. Overall, the findings suggest that remote pain management provision to target reduction of catastrophizing and increases to physical activity could be beneficial for chronic pain patients in overcoming the adverse effects of lockdown.

Matching journals

1
Pain
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.2%
183× avg
2
The Journal of Pain
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
#1
220× avg
3
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 34%
13.9%
4
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.1%
121× avg
5
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 26%
7.1%
6
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 26%
3.3%
7
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.7%
22× avg
8
Social Science & Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.3%
32× avg
9
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 6%
4.0× avg
10
Frontiers in Digital Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 1%
18× avg
11
BMC Neurology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 1.0%
25× avg
12
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 7%
3.6× avg
13
BJGP Open
Royal College of General Practitioners · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.9%
22× avg
14
Science Advances
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) · based on 52 published papers
Top 2%
7.9× avg
15
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Elsevier BV · based on 19 published papers
Top 2%
13× avg
16
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
8.2× avg