Design of a Novel Multiplex Real Time RT-PCR Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Detection
Zhen, W.; Berry, G. J.
Show abstract
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has resulted in more than 386,000 deaths globally as of June 4, 2020. In this study, we developed a novel multiplex real time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR test for detection of SARS-CoV-2, with primers designed to amplify a 108 bp target on the spike surface glycoprotein (S gene) of SARS-CoV-2 and a hydrolysis Taqman probe designed to specifically detect SARS-CoV-2. Following our design, we evaluated the Limit of detection (LOD) and clinical performance of this laboratory-developed test (LDT). A LOD study with inactivated whole virus exhibited equal performance to that seen in the modified CDC assay with a final LOD of 1,301 ± 13 genome equivalents/ml for our assay vs 1,249 ± 14 genome equivalents/ml for the modified CDC assay. In addition, a clinical evaluation with 270 nasopharyngeal (NP) swab specimens exhibited 98.5% positive percent agreement and 99.3% negative percent agreement with the modified CDC assay. The multiplex design of this assay allows the testing of 91 patients per plate, versus a maximum of 29 patients per plate on the modified CDC assay, providing the benefit of testing significantly more patients per run and saving reagents during a time when both of these parameters have been critical. Our results demonstrate that our multiplex assay performs as well as the modified CDC assay, but is more efficient and cost effective and is therefore adequate for use as a diagnostic assay and for epidemiological surveillance and clinical management of SARS-CoV-2.View Full Text
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Analytical and Clinical Comparison of Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Detection 98%
- Test Agreement Between Roche Cobas 6800 and Cepheid GeneXpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assays at High Cycle Threshold Ranges 97%
- Estimating the false positive rate of highly automated SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification testing 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Recommendations for sample pooling on the Cepheid GeneXpert(R) system using the Cepheid Xpert(R) Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay 96%
- Validation of a Novel Molecular Assay to the Diagnostic of COVID-19 Based on Real Time PCR with High Resolution Melting 96%
- An international, interlaboratory ring trial confirms the feasibility of an open-source, extraction-less “direct” RT-qPCR method for reliable detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical samples 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a qualitative real-time RT-PCR assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: A guide and case study in setting up an emergency-use, laboratory-developed molecular assay 96%
- Increasing both specificity and sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using an adaptive orthogonal testing approach 94%
- Molecular point-of-care testing for influenza A/B and respiratory syncytial virus: comparison of workflow parameters for the ID Now and cobas Liat systems 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation and Performance Comparison of Three SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assays 95%
- Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Human Biofluids Using the Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay: A Prospective Diagnostic Study in Fortaleza, Brazil 95%
- Real-life performance of a novel antigen detection test on nasopharyngeal specimens for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis: a prospective study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of commercial qPCR kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in pooled samples 97%
- Evaluation and modelling of the performance of an automated SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay according to sample type, target population and epidemic trends 94%
- Implementation of a Rapid RT-LAMP Saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 Testing Program in the Workplace 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.