Brain network connectivity in major depression: extending findings from a large public data set by meta-analysis across sites
Tozzi, L.; Williams, L. M.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWIn this short communication, we test whether patients with major depression and healthy individuals have different functional connectivity within established brain networks. To this end, we leverage a very large multi-site data set of resting state fMRI data (1,300 depressed patients and 1,128 controls) collected by 25 groups. A previous study conducted on this data set compared functional connectivity of the default mode network between the two groups. In our investigation, we performed a meta-analysis across sites quantifying the effects of depression and symptom severity on connectivity of several brain-wide networks beyond the default mode. Running a meta-analysis instead of a mega-analysis also allowed us to calculate effect sizes, heterogeneity and prediction intervals that will be valuable to inform future studies wishing to investigate network functional connectivity in depression. Our results indicate that network connectivity differences between depressed and healthy subjects are consistently small, with confidence intervals almost always encompassing zero, in line with the mixed findings from previous research. Default mode network connectivity differences between depressed patients and controls were exceptionally heterogeneous across sites, suggesting the existence of depression sub-types with normo- and hypo-connected default mode network or a strong impact of clinical confounds on default mode network connectivity. The only networks for which connectivity in depressed individuals was consistently lower than in controls were the somatomotor and visual networks, which could be promising understudied targets for future investigation. Overall, we highlight the need of minimizing heterogeneity in future multi-site studies on functional connectivity in depression and the need for more research on novel taxonomies of mental illness that are robustly anchored in brain function.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Disrupted Limbic-Prefrontal Effective Connectivity in Response to Fearful Faces in Lifetime Depression 94%
- Trait repetitive negative thinking in depression is associated with functional connectivity in negative thinking state rather than resting state 94%
- Brain-Symptom Network Models of Depressive Symptoms: Understanding Heterogeneity and Clinical Implications 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental health in the UK Biobank: a roadmap to self-report measures and neuroimaging correlates 95%
- Tensorial Independent Component Analysis Reveals Social and Reward Networks Associated with Major Depressive Disorder 94%
- Multimodal fusion of structural and functional brain imaging in depression using linked independent component analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Altered Dynamic Functional Connectivity of the Frontoparietal Network in Major Depressive Disorder: Evidence for Hypoconnectivity and Reduced State Transitions 96%
- No effect of tDCS on fatigue and depression in chronic stroke patients: an exploratory randomized sham-controlled trial combining tDCS with computerized cognitive training 92%
- Effective connectivity during autobiographical memory search 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Energy inefficiency underpinning brain state dysregulation in individuals with major depressive disorder 91%
- Genetic overlap between multivariate measures of human functional brain connectivity and psychiatric disorders 90%
- Brain mechanisms underlying the emotion processing bias in treatment-resistant depression 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applying Machine-Learning and Deep-Learning to Predict Depression from Brain MRI and Identify Depression-Related Brain Biology 94%
- A Brain Model of Altered Self-Appraisal in Social Anxiety Disorder 93%
- Whole-brain Mechanism of Neurofeedback Therapy: Predictive Modeling of Neurofeedback Outcomes on Repetitive Negative Thinking in Depression 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.