Back

Performance characteristics of the ID NOW COVID-19 assay: A regional health care system experience

Ghofrani, M.; Casas, M. T.; Pelz, R. K.; Kroll, C.; Blum, N.; Foster, S. D.

2020-06-05 pathology
10.1101/2020.06.03.20116327 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesWe compared the Abbott ID NOW COVID-19 point-of-care test (POCT) with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods to assess the claimed sensitivity and specificity of POCT and to optimize test utilization in our regional health care system. MethodsAssuming PCR to be the gold standard, we used a convenience sampling of mostly symptomatic COVID-19 suspect hospital patients who had already been tested for internal validation and guideline development purposes by both PCR and POCT to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of POCT with Clopper-Pearson 95% confidence intervals (CI). ResultsDuring the study period, 113 paired patient samples met eligibility criteria. The sensitivity of POCT in this population was calculated to be 94.1% [CI 71.31-99.85%] and the specificity was 99.0% [CI 94.33-99.97%]. ConclusionsBased on the lower sensitivity of POCT and the estimated prevalence of COVID-19 in our symptomatic and asymptomatic hospital patients, we recommend a two-pronged testing approach in which COVID-19 suspect patients are tested by the more sensitive PCR, while asymptomatic patients with a low pre-test probability of infection are tested with POCT supplemented by PCR confirmation of positive results. Furthermore, isolation decisions should not be based on POCT results alone.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.7%
3
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
6
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
8
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
9
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
11
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
24
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%