Performance characteristics of the ID NOW COVID-19 assay: A regional health care system experience
Ghofrani, M.; Casas, M. T.; Pelz, R. K.; Kroll, C.; Blum, N.; Foster, S. D.
Show abstract
ObjectivesWe compared the Abbott ID NOW COVID-19 point-of-care test (POCT) with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods to assess the claimed sensitivity and specificity of POCT and to optimize test utilization in our regional health care system. MethodsAssuming PCR to be the gold standard, we used a convenience sampling of mostly symptomatic COVID-19 suspect hospital patients who had already been tested for internal validation and guideline development purposes by both PCR and POCT to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of POCT with Clopper-Pearson 95% confidence intervals (CI). ResultsDuring the study period, 113 paired patient samples met eligibility criteria. The sensitivity of POCT in this population was calculated to be 94.1% [CI 71.31-99.85%] and the specificity was 99.0% [CI 94.33-99.97%]. ConclusionsBased on the lower sensitivity of POCT and the estimated prevalence of COVID-19 in our symptomatic and asymptomatic hospital patients, we recommend a two-pronged testing approach in which COVID-19 suspect patients are tested by the more sensitive PCR, while asymptomatic patients with a low pre-test probability of infection are tested with POCT supplemented by PCR confirmation of positive results. Furthermore, isolation decisions should not be based on POCT results alone.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a qualitative real-time RT-PCR assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: A guide and case study in setting up an emergency-use, laboratory-developed molecular assay 94%
- Molecular point-of-care testing for influenza A/B and respiratory syncytial virus: comparison of workflow parameters for the ID Now and cobas Liat systems 93%
- Increasing both specificity and sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using an adaptive orthogonal testing approach 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of a novel, rapid antigen detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 95%
- An optimized stepwise algorithm combining rapid antigen and RT-qPCR for screening of COVID-19 patients 95%
- Evaluation of the accuracy and ease-of-use of Abbott PanBio - A WHO emergency use listed, rapid, antigen-detecting point-of-care diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A multicenter study to assess the performance of the point-of-care RT-PCR Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat system in comparison with centralized assays across healthcare facilities in the United States 95%
- Performance and Implementation Evaluation of the Abbott BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test in a High-throughput Drive-through Community Testing Site in Massachusetts 95%
- Clinical evaluation of BD Veritor SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test performance compared to PCR-based testing and versus the Sofia 2 SARS Antigen point-of-care test. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation and modelling of the performance of an automated SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay according to sample type, target population and epidemic trends 92%
- Evaluation of commercial qPCR kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in pooled samples 92%
- Reducing the Cost of Rapid Antigen Tests through Swab Pooling and Extraction in a Device 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Ordering Practices of the SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Test at a Large Academic Medical Center 94%
- Evaluation of nasopharyngeal swab collection techniques for nucleic acid recovery and participant experience: recommendations for COVID-19 diagnostics 92%
- Clinical assessment and validation of a rapid and sensitive SARS-CoV-2 test using reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.