Back

Large-Scale Sparse Regression for Multiple Responses with Applications to UK Biobank

Qian, J.; Tanigawa, Y.; Li, R.; Tibshirani, R.; Rivas, M. A.; Hastie, T.

2020-05-31 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.05.30.125252 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In high-dimensional regression problems, often a relatively small subset of the features are relevant for predicting the outcome, and methods that impose sparsity on the solution are popular. When multiple correlated outcomes are available (multitask), reduced rank regression is an effective way to borrow strength and capture latent structures that underlie the data. Our proposal is motivated by the UK Biobank population-based cohort study, where we are faced with large-scale, ultrahigh-dimensional features, and have access to a large number of outcomes (phenotypes): lifestyle measures, biomarkers, and disease outcomes. We are hence led to fit sparse reduced-rank regression models, using computational strategies that allow us to scale to problems of this size. We use an iterative algorithm that alternates between solving the sparse regression problem and solving the reduced rank decomposition. For the sparse regression component, we propose a scalable iterative algorithm based on adaptive screening that leverages the sparsity assumption and enables us to focus on solving much smaller sub-problems. The full solution is reconstructed and tested via an optimality condition to make sure it is a valid solution for the original problem. We further extend the method to cope with practical issues such as the inclusion of confounding variables and imputation of missing values among the phenotypes. Experiments on both synthetic data and the UK Biobank data demonstrate the effectiveness of the method and the algorithm. We present multiSnpnet package, available at http://github.com/junyangq/multiSnpnet that works on top of PLINK2 files, which we anticipate to be a valuable tool for generating polygenic risk scores from human genetic studies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biostatistics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 1%
17.5%
3
The Annals of Applied Statistics
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Journal of Computational Biology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biometrics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
6
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.2%
8
Statistics in Medicine
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
10
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
12
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.2%
14
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
18
Journal of Mathematical Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
21
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.6%
22
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.6%
23
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%