Back

Time courses of COVID-19 infection and local variation in socioeconomic and health disparities in England

Liu, S. H.; Liu, B.; Li, Y.; Norbury, A.

2020-05-29 public and global health
10.1101/2020.05.29.20116921 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo identify factors associated with local variation in the time course of COVID-19 case burden in England. MethodsWe analyzed laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 case data for 150 upper tier local authorities, from the period from January 30 to May 6, 2020, as reported by Public Health England. Using methods suitable for time-series data, we identified clusters of local authorities with distinct trajectories of daily cases, after adjusting for population size. We then tested for differences in sociodemographic, economic, and health disparity factors between these clusters. ResultsTwo clusters of local authorities were identified: a higher case trajectory that rose faster over time to reach higher peak infection levels, and a lower case trajectory cluster that emerged more slowly, and had a lower peak. The higher case trajectory cluster (79 local authorities) had higher population density (p<0.001), higher proportion of Black and Asian residents (p=0.03; p=0.02), higher multiple deprivation scores (p<0.001), a lower proportions of older adults (p=0.005), and higher preventable mortality rates (p=0.03). Local authorities with higher proportions of Black residents were more likely to belong to the high case trajectory cluster, even after adjusting for population density, deprivation, proportion of older adults and preventable mortality (p=0.04). ConclusionAreas belonging to the trajectory with significantly higher COVID-19 case burden were more deprived, and had higher proportions of ethnic minority residents. A higher proportion of Black residents in regions belonging to the high trajectory cluster was not fully explained by differences in population density, deprivation, and other overall health disparities between the clusters. What is already known on this subject?Emerging evidence suggests that the burden of COVID-19 infection is falling unequally across England, with provisional data suggesting higher overall infection and mortality rates for Black, Asian, and mixed race/ethnicity individuals. What does this study add?We found that regions with greater socioeconomic deprivation and poorer population health measures showed a faster rise in COVID-19 cases, and reached higher peak case levels. Areas with a higher proportion of Black residents were more likely to show this kind of time course, even after adjusting for multiple co-occurring factors, including population density. This finding merits further investigation in terms of the intersecting vulnerability factors Black and other minority ethnic individuals face in England (e.g. proportion of people working in service and caring roles, and the role of structural discrimination), and has implications for the ongoing allocation of public health resources, in order to better mitigate such inequalities.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
17.0%
2
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
3
Health & Place
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
6
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
8
European Journal of Public Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
9
BMC Geriatrics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
Social Science & Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
16
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Age and Ageing
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
The British Journal of Psychiatry
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
Journal of Public Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Health Expectations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
24
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
25
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
26
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
27
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.6%
28
European Journal of Epidemiology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%