Back

A peptide-level multiple imputation strategy accounting for the different natures of missing values in proteomics data

Giai Gianetto, Q.; Wieczorek, S.; Coute, Y.; Burger, T.

2020-05-30 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.05.29.122770 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MotivationQuantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics data are characterized by high rates of missing values, which may be of two kinds: missing completely-at-random (MCAR) and missing not-at-random (MNAR). Despite numerous imputation methods available in the literature, none account for this duality, for it would require to diagnose the missingness mechanism behind each missing value. ResultsA multiple imputation strategy is proposed by combining MCAR-devoted and MNAR-devoted imputation algorithms. First, we propose an estimator for the proportion of MCAR values and show it is asymptotically unbiased under assumptions adapted to label-free proteomics data. This allows us to estimate the number of MCAR values in each sample and to take into account the nature of missing values through an original multiple imputation method. We evaluate this approach on simulated data and shows it outperforms traditionally used imputation algorithms. AvailabilityThe proposed methods are implemented in the R package imp4p (available on the CRAN Giai Gianetto (2020)), which is itself accessible through Prostar software. Contactquentin.giaigianetto@pasteur.fr; thomas.burger@cea.fr

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.