Back

Intensive COVID-19 testing associated with reduced mortality - an ecological analysis of 108 countries

Kenyon, C.

2020-05-30 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.05.28.20115691 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIntensive screening and testing for COVID-19 could facilitate early detection and isolation of infected persons and thereby control the size of the epidemic. It could also facilitate earlier and more targeted therapy. These factors could plausibly reduce attributable mortality which was the hypothesis tested in this study. MethodsLinear regression was used to assess the country-level association between COVID-19 attributable mortality per 100 000 inhabitants (mortality/capita) and COVID-19 tests/capita (number of tests/100 000 inhabitants) controlling for the cumulative number of COVID-19 infections/100 000 inhabitants (cases/capita), the age of the epidemic (number of days between first case reported and 8 April), national health expenditure per capita and WHO world region. ResultsThe COVID-19 mortality rate varied between 0.3 and 3110 deaths/100 000 inhabitants (median 30, IQR 8-105). The intensity of testing per 100 000 also varied considerably (median 21,970, IQR 2,735-89,095) as did the number of COVID-19 cases per 100 000 (median 1,600, IQR 340-4,760 cases/100 000). In the multivariate model, the COVID-19 mortality rate was negatively associated with tests/capita (Coef. -0.036, 95% CI -0.047- -0.025) and positively associated with cases/capita (Coef. 0.093, 95% CI 0.819- 1.034). ConclusionsThe results are compatible with the hypothesis that intensive testing and isolation could play a role in reducing COVID-10 mortality rates.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
4
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
5
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
6
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
11
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
18
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
22
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
29
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%