Covid19db -- An online database of trials of medicinal products to prevent or treat COVID-19, with a specific focus on drug repurposing
Pantziarka, P.; Vandeborne, L.; Meheus, L.; Bouche, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe global pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus has prompted an unprecedented international effort to seek medicines for prevention and treatment of infection. Drug repurposing has played a key part in this response. The rapid increase in trial activity has raised questions about efficiency and lack of coordination. Our objective was to develop a user-friendly, open access database to monitor and rapidly identify trials of medicinal products. MethodsUsing the US clinicaltrials.gov (NCT) registry, the EU Clinical Trials Register (EUCTR) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP), we identified all COVID-19 trials of medicinal products. Trials that were out of scope and duplicates were excluded. A manual encoding was performed to ascertain key information (e.g. trial aim, type of intervention etc). The database, Covid19db, is published online at: http://www.redo-project.org/covid19db/. ResultsDescriptive statistics of the database from April 4th 2020 through to August 18th show an increase from 186 to 1618 trials, or an average of 10.5 new trials registered per day. Over this period, the proportion of trials including a repurposing arm decreased slightly (from a maximum of 75% to 64% at the end of the covered period) as did the proportion of trials aiming to prevent infection (from a maximum of 16% to 13%). The most popular trial intervention is hydroxychloroquine (212 trials), followed by azithromycin (64 trials), tocilizumab, favipiravir and chloroquine (145 trials). Total planned enrolment is 1064556 participants as of 18th August 2020. Conclusionswe have developed an open access and regularly updated tool to monitor clinical trials of medicinal products to prevent or treat infection by SARS-CoV-2 globally. Our analysis shows a high number of me-too trials, in particular for some repurposed drugs, such as hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and tocilizumab, substantiating calls for better coordination and better use of trial resources.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Reporting of Retrospective Registration in Clinical Trial Publications 93%
- An Analysis of Controlled Human Infection Studies Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 93%
- Efficacy of remdesivir versus placebo for the treatment of COVID-19: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring scalable assessment methods for terminated trials in ClinicalTrials.gov: A cohort analysis of German and Californian trials 94%
- Analysis of clinical trial registry entry histories using the novel R package cthist 93%
- How Informative Were Early SARS-CoV-2 Treatment and Prevention Trials? A longitudinal cohort analysis of trials registered on clinicaltrials.gov 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigator-initiated versus industry-sponsored trials – Visibility and relevance of randomized controlled trials in clinical practice guidelines (IMPACT) 93%
- Evaluation of SURUS: a Named Entity Recognition System to Extract Knowledge from Interventional Study Records 92%
- Approaches in Analyzing Predictors of Trial Failure: A Scoping Review and Meta-epidemiological study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Core Outcome Set for Clinical Trials of COVID-19 based on Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine 91%
- Echinacea purpurea for the Long-term Prevention of Viral Respiratory Tract Infections during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized, Open, Controlled, Exploratory Clinical Study 91%
- Innovative, rapid, high throughput method for drug repurposing in a pandemic - a case study of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.