Vpr R36W and R77Q Mutations Alter HIV-1 Replication and Cytotoxicity in T Lymphocytes
Solis-Leal, A.; Karlinsey, D. C.; Lopez, J. B.; Planelles, V.; Poole, B. D.; Berges, B. K.
Show abstract
Chronic immune inflammation (CII) is a characteristic symptom of HIV-1 infection that contributes to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) progression in infected patients. Distinct AIDS development rates have shown that there are Rapid Progressor (RP) and Long-Term Non-Progressor (LTNP) patients, but the circumstances governing these differences in disease progression are poorly understood. Mutations in the Viral Protein R (Vpr) have been suggested to have a direct impact on disease progression. Studies have shown that Vpr interacts with both host and viral factors; these interactions affect cellular activities such as cell cycle progression and enhancement of apoptosis. The Vpr mutants R36W and R77Q have been associated with RP and LTNP phenotypes, respectively; however, these findings are still controversial. This study sheds light on the effects that Vpr mutations have in the context of HIV-1 infection of the HUT78 T cell line, using replication-competent CXCR4-tropic virus strains. Our results show a replication enhancement of the R36W mutant (increased viral load and percentage of p24+ cells) accompanied by increased cytotoxicity. Interestingly, the R77Q mutant showed a unique enhancement of apoptosis (measured by Annexin V and TUNEL staining) and G2 cell cycle arrest; these effects were not seen with WT or R36W viruses. Since necrosis is associated with the release of pro-inflammatory factors, the R36 mutation could lead to more robust CII and the RP phenotype. Conversely, the R77Q mutation leads to apoptosis, potentially avoiding CII and leading to a LTNP phenotype. Thus, Vpr mutations may impact HIV-1 related progression to AIDS. ImportanceThe vpr gene is thought to be an important virulence factor in Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1). vpr polymorphisms have been associated with different rates of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) progression. However, there is controversy about the cytopathic and virulence phenotypes of Vpr mutants, with contradictory conclusions about the same mutants. Here, we examine the replication capacity, apoptosis induction, and G2 cell cycle arrest phenotypes of three vpr mutants compared to wild-type HIV-1. One mutant associated with rapid AIDS progression replicated more efficiently and killed cells more rapidly than wild-type HIV-1. Another mutant associated with slow AIDS progression triggered apoptosis more efficiently than wild-type HIV-1. These results shed additional light on the role of vpr polymorphisms in T cell killing by HIV-1 and may help to explain the role of Vpr in different rates of AIDS progression.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Variability in HIV-1 Transmitted/Founder Virus Susceptibility to Combined APOBEC3F and APOBEC3G Host Restriction 97%
- An infectious Rous Sarcoma Virus Gag mutant that is defective in nuclear cycling 97%
- V3 tip determinants of susceptibility to inhibition by CD4-mimetic compounds in natural clade A human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) envelope glycoproteins 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic variation of the HIV-1 subtype C transmitted/founder viruses long terminal repeat elements and the impact on transcription activation potential and clinical disease outcomes 97%
- The HIV-1 capsid serves as a nanoscale reaction vessel for reverse transcription 96%
- Intragenic proviral elements support transcription of defective HIV-1 proviruses 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nef enhances HIV-1 replication and infectivity independently of SERINC3 and SERINC5 in CEM T cells 97%
- TF protein of Sindbis virus antagonizes host type I interferon responses in a palmitoylation-dependent manner 96%
- Sensitivity to Monoclonal Antibody 447-52D and an Open Env Trimer Conformation Correlate Poorly with Inhibition of HIV-1 Infectivity by SERINC5 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.