Back

An efficient gene excision system in maize

ANAND, A.; Wang, N.; Arling, M.; Hoerster, G.; Ryan, L.; Wu, E.; Lowe, K.; Gordon-Kamm, W.; Jones, T.; Chilcoat, D.

2020-05-29 plant biology
10.1101/2020.05.26.116996 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Use of the morphogenic genes Baby Boom (Bbm) and Wuschel2 (Wus2), along with new ternary constructs, has increased the genotype range and the type of explants that can be used for maize transformation. In addition, altering the ectopic expression pattern for Bbm/Wus2 has resulted in rapid maize transformation methods that are faster and applicable to a broader range of inbreds. However, expression of Bbm/Wus2 can compromise the quality of regenerated plants, leading to sterility. We reasoned excising morphogenic genes after transformation but before regeneration would increase production of fertile T0 plants. We developed a method that uses an inducible site-specific recombinase (Cre) to excise morphogenic genes. The use of developmentally regulated promoters, such as Ole, Glb1, End2 and Ltp2, to drive Cre enabled excision of morphogenic genes in early embryo development and produced excised events at a rate of 25%-100%. A different strategy utilizing an excision-activated selectable marker produced excised events at a rate of 53.3%-68.4%; however, the transformation frequency was lower (12.9%-49.9%). The use of inducible heat shock promoters (e.g. Hsp17.7, Hsp26) to express Cre, along with improvements in tissue culture conditions and construct design, resulted in high frequencies of T0 transformation (29%-69%), excision (50%-97%), usable quality events (3.6%-14%), and few escapes (non-transgenic; 14%-17%) in three elite maize inbreds. Transgenic events produced by this method are free of morphogenic and marker genes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
12.3%
2
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
9.0%
5
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
8
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
9
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
10
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
13
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
14
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
20
Plant Cell Reports
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
21
Phytobiomes Journal
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
22
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
23
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
24
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%