Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 RNA-Sequences by Interpretable Machine Learning Models
Villmann, T.; Kaden, M.; Bohnsack, K. S.; Weber, M.; Kudla, M.; Gutowska, K.; Blazewicz, J.
Show abstract
We present an approach to investigate SARS-CoV-2 virus sequences based on alignment-free methods for RNA sequence comparison. In particular, we verify a given clustering result for the GISAID data set, which was obtained analyzing the molecular differences in coronavirus populations by phylogenetic trees. For this purpose, we use alignment-free dissimilarity measures for sequences and combine them with learning vector quantization classifiers for virus type discriminant analysis and classification. Those vector quantizers belong to the class of interpretable machine learning methods, which, on the one hand side provide additional knowledge about the classification decisions like discriminant feature correlations, and on the other hand can be equipped with a reject option. This option gives the model the property of self controlled evidence if applied to new data, i.e. the models refuses to make a classification decision, if the model evidence for the presented data is not given. After training such a classifier for the GISAID data set, we apply the obtained classifier model to another but unlabeled SARS-CoV-2 virus data set. On the one hand side, this allows us to assign new sequences to already known virus types and, on the other hand, the rejected sequences allow speculations about new virus types with respect to nucleotide base mutations in the viral sequences. Author summaryThe currently emerging global disease COVID-19 caused by novel SARS-CoV-2 viruses requires all scientific effort to investigate the development of the viral epidemy, the properties of the virus and its types. Investigations of the virus sequence are of special interest. Frequently, those are based on mathematical/statistical analysis. However, machine learning methods represent a promising alternative, if one focuses on interpretable models, i.e. those that do not act as black-boxes. Doing so, we apply variants of Learning Vector Quantizers to analyze the SARS-CoV-2 sequences. We encoded the sequences and compared them in their numerical representations to avoid the computationally costly comparison based on sequence alignments. Our resulting model is interpretable, robust, efficient, and has a self-controlling mechanism regarding the applicability to data. This framework was applied to two data sets concerning SARS-CoV-2. We were able to verify previously published virus type findings for one of the data sets by training our model to accurately identify the virus type of sequences. For sequences without virus type information (second data set), our trained model can predict them. Thereby, we observe a new scattered spreading of the sequences in the data space which probably is caused by mutations in the viral sequences.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning massive interpretable gene regulatory networks of the human brain by merging Bayesian Networks 96%
- Determining clinically relevant features in cytometry data using persistent homology 95%
- Model guided trait-specific co-expression network estimation as a new perspective for identifying molecular interactions and pathways 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transfer Learning Models for Bacterial Strain Dissemination Biomarkers using Weighted Non-Parallel Proximal Support Vector Machines 96%
- A Comparison of Embedding Aggregation Strategies in Drug-Target Interaction Prediction 95%
- De novo identification of maximally deregulated subnetworks based on multi-omics data with DeRegNet 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- PALLAS: Penalized mAximum LikeLihood and pArticle Swarms for inference of gene regulatory networks from time series data 96%
- Small-sample estimation of the mutational support and the distribution of mutations in the SARS-Cov-2 genome 96%
- Rapid Reconstruction of Time-varying Gene Regulatory Networks with Limited Main Memory 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.