How are adversities during COVID-19 affecting mental health? Differential associations for worries and experiences and implications for policy
Wright, L.; Steptoe, A.; Fancourt, D.
Show abstract
ImportanceMultiple data sources suggest that COVID-19 is having adverse effects on mental health. But it is vital to understand what is causing this: worries over potential adversities due to the pandemic, or the toll of experiencing adverse events. ObjectiveTo explore the time-varying longitudinal relationship between (i) worries about adversity, and (ii) experience of adversity, and both anxiety and depression and test the moderating role of socio-economic position. DesignLongitudinal cohort study SettingCommunity study ParticipantsA well-stratified sample of UK adults recruited into the UCL COVID -19 Social Study (a panel study collecting data weekly during the Covid-19 pandemic) via a combination of convenience and targeted recruitment. The sample was weighted to population proportions of gender, age, ethnicity, education and geographical location. ExposuresWorries or experiences of adversities during the COVID-19 pandemic OutcomesAnxiety (GAD-7) and depression (PHQ-9) ResultsData were analysed from 41,909 UK adults (weighted data: 51% female, aged 18-99) followed up across 6 weeks (178,430 observations). Using fixed effects regression was used to explore within-person variation over time, cumulative number of worries and experience of adversities were both related to higher levels of anxiety and depression. Number of worries were associated more with anxiety than depression, but number of experiences were equally related to anxiety and depression. Individuals of lower socio-economic position were more negatively affected psychologically by adverse experiences. Conclusions & relevanceMeasures over the first few weeks of lockdown in the UK appear to have been insufficient at reassuring people given we are still seeing clear associations with poor mental health both for cumulative worries and also for a range of specific worries relating to finance, access to essentials, personal safety and COVID-19. Interventions are required that both seek to prevent adverse events (e.g. redundancies) and that reassure individuals and support adaptive coping strategies. Key pointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSHow do worries over potential adversities due to the COVID-19 pandemic, or the toll of experiencing adverse events affect mental health? FindingsCumulative number of worries and experience of adversities were both related to higher levels of anxiety and depression during COVID-19, especially amongst individuals of lower socio-economic position. MeaningDuring a pandemic, interventions are required that both seek to prevent adverse events (e.g. redundancies) and that reassure individuals and support adaptive coping strategies.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Did social factors buffer against the effect of adversities on self-harm during the COVID-19 pandemic? A longitudinal analysis of 49,227 UK adults 94%
- The prevalence, incidence, prognosis and risk factors for depression and anxiety in a UK cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-wave cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining the association between family status and depression in the UK Biobank 93%
- Is Google Trends a useful tool for tracking mental and social distress during a public health emergency? A time-series analysis 92%
- Association among income loss, financial strain and depressive symptoms during COVID-19: evidence from two longitudinal studies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- “When will this end? Will it end?” The impact of the March-June 2020 UK Covid-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study 95%
- Mental health in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: early observations 94%
- Perceptions and behavioural responses of the general public during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey of UK Adults 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing mental health trajectories of four different types of key workers with non-key workers: A 12-month follow-up observational study of 21,874 adults in England during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- The impact of shielding during the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health: Evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing 94%
- Ethnic inequalities in compulsory psychiatric hospital detentions during UK COVID-19 'lockdowns': A Regression Discontinuity Design in time study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social isolation in mid-life: associations with psychological distress, life satisfaction and self-rated health in two successive British birth cohorts 95%
- Adult life-course trajectories of psychological distress and economic outcomes in midlife during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Impact on mental health care and on mental health service users of the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods survey of UK mental health care staff 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.