Back

Off-Label Real World Experience Using Tocilizumab for Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 Disease in a Regional Community Health System: A Case-Control Study

Ramaswamy, M.; Mannam, P.; Comer, R.; Sinclair, E.; McQuaid, D. B.; Schmidt, M. L.

2020-05-19 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2020.05.14.20099234 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo determine if Tocilizumab treatment in patients hospitalized with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and subsequent COVID-19 disease provides short-term survival benefit. DesignCase-control, observational study that includes an observation period from arrival to discharge or inpatient death. Both Cox proportional hazards and average treatment effects models were used to determine survival and treatment benefits. SettingThree Cone Health acute care hospitals including one COVID dedicated facility. PatientsPatients admitted with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 from March 16, 2020 through April 22, 2020. ExposureTocilizumab dosed at either 400 mg fixed dose or 8 mg/kg weight-based dose with maximum single dose of 800mg. Measurements and Main ResultsOverall, 86 patients were admitted during the observation period with confirmed COVID-19 disease. Of these, 21 received Tocilizumab during the hospital stay. Both the Cox model and treatment effects models showed short-term survival benefit. There was an associated 75% reduction in the risk of inpatient death when treated (HR 0.25; 95% CI 0.07-0.90) in the Cox model. This association was confirmed in the treatment effects model where we found a 52.7% reduced risk of dying while hospitalized compared to those not treated (RR 0.472; 95% CI 0.449-0.497). In both models, we show short-term survival benefit in patients with severe COVID-19 illness.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.8%
2
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.8%
3
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
7
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
8
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
10
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
11
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
15
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
17
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
18
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
20
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
27
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%