Adjusted fatality rates of COVID19 pandemic: a comparison across countries
Canelo-Aybar, C.; Beltran, J.; Santero, M.; Alonso-Coello, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundA key impact measure of COVID-19 pandemic is the case fatality rate (CFR), but estimating it during an epidemic is challenging as the true number of cases may remain elusive. ObjectiveTo estimate the CFR applying a delay-adjusted method across countries, exploring differences to simple methods and potential correlation to country level variables. MethodsSecondary analysis of publicly available data from countries with [≥]500 cases by April 30th. We calculated CFR adjusting for delay time from diagnosis to death and using simple methods for comparison. We performed a random effects meta-analysis to pooling CFRs for all countries and for those with high testing coverage and low positivity rate. We explored correlation of adjusted CFR with age structure and health care resources at country level. ResultsWe included 107 countries and the Diamond Princess cruise-ship. The overall delay adjusted CFR was 2.8% (95%CI: 2.1 to 3.1) while naive CFR was 5.1% (95%CI: 4.1 to 6.2). In countries with high testing coverage/low positivity rate the pooled adjusted CFR was 2.1% (95%CI: 1.5 to 3.0), there was a correlation with age over 65 years ({beta} = 0.12; 95%CI: 0.06 to 0.18), but not with number of physician or critical care beds. Naive method underestimated the CFR of the CFR with a median of 1.3% across countries. ConclusionOur best estimation of CFR across countries is 2% and varies according to the aged population size. Modelers and policy makers may consider these results to assess the impact of lockdowns or other mitigation policies.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on US Mortality: A County-Level Analysis 91%
- Factors associated with excess all-cause mortality in the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a time-series analysis using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink 91%
- A Systematic Review of Machine Learning-based Prognostic Models for Acute Pancreatitis: Towards Improving Methods and Reporting Quality 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pandemic trends in health care use: From the hospital bed to the general practitioner with COVID-19 93%
- Impacts of COVID-19 on long-term health and health care use 92%
- The confounded crude case-fatality rates for COVID-19 hide more than they reveal - a comparison of age-specific and age-adjusted rates between six countries 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the Burden of COVID-19 in Developing Countries: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Public Policy Implications 91%
- Precision shielding for COVID-19: metrics of assessment and feasibility of deployment 91%
- The isolated effect of age on the risk of COVID-19 severe outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- US Exceptionalism? International Trends in Midlife Mortality 90%
- Changes in stillbirths and child and youth mortality in 2020 and 2021 during the Covid-19 pandemic 90%
- Faltering survival improvements at young-middle ages in high-income English-speaking countries: population-level period and cohort analyses 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.