Sparse input neural networks to differentiate 32 primary cancer types based on somatic point mutations
Dikaios, N.
Show abstract
This paper aims to differentiate cancer types from primary tumour samples based on somatic point mutations (SPM). Primary cancer site identification is necessary to perform site-specific and potentially targeted treatment. Current methods like histopathology/lab-tests cannot accurately determine cancers origin, which results in empirical patient treatment and poor survival rates. The availability of large deoxyribonucleic-acid sequencing datasets has allowed scientists to examine the ability of SPM to classify primary cancer sites. These datasets are highly sparse since most genes will not be mutated, have low signal-to-noise ratio and are imbalanced since rare cancers have less samples. To overcome these limitations a sparse-input neural network (spinn) is suggested that projects the input data in a lower dimensional space, where the more informative genes are used for learning. To train and evaluate spinn, an extensive dataset was collected from the cancer genome atlas containing 7624 samples spanning 32 cancer types. Different sampling strategies were performed to balance the dataset but have not benefited the classifiers performance except for removing Tomek-links. This is probably due to high amount of class overlapping. Spinn consistently outperformed algorithms like extreme gradient-boosting, deep neural networks and support-vector-machines, achieving an accuracy up to 73% on independent testing data.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel ratio-metric features enable the identification of new driver genes across cancer types 97%
- Classification models for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Progression, based on gene expression data-trained supervised machine learning 96%
- A Convolution Based Computational Approach Towards DNA N6-methyladenine Site Identification and Motif Extraction in Rice Genome 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- pyCancerSig: subclassifying human cancer with comprehensive single nucleotide, structural and microsatellite mutational signature deconstruction from whole genome sequencing 95%
- Investigate the relevance of major signaling pathways in cancer survival using a biologically meaningful deep learning model 95%
- Ranking Cancer Drivers via Betweenness-based Outlier Detection and Random Walks 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Benchmarking feature selection and feature extraction methods to improve the performances of machine-learning algorithms for patient classification using metabolomics biomedical data. 96%
- Wide and Deep Learning for Automatic Cell Type Identification 96%
- Topological embedding and directional feature importance in ensemble classifiers for multi-class classification 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.