Back

Basic emergency Obstetric and Neonatal Care Knowledge retention and Skills of Health Professionals in Burundi following an ALARM International Program Training: A pilot study

Kalay, A. L.; Mareschal, V.; Ndereye, J.; Cook, J.

2020-05-18 sexual and reproductive health
10.1101/2020.05.11.20098632 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThis study describes the immediate and short-term improvement in basic emergency obstetric and neonatal care (BEmONC) knowledge and skills after ALARM International Programme (AIP) training in Burundi. Subjects and MethodIn 2017, sixteen health professionals participated in a 5-day AIP training. They completed pre and post course tests. At the end of the training, they did objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) on postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), shoulder dystocia and neonatal resuscitation. In 2018, a refresher course was offered to participants who scored the highest in the 2017 post-training test. Pre and post tests were administered. Mean pre- and post-test scores and t-paired test was performed to determine the knowledge change and retention between 2017 and 2018. Mean OSCE scores were calculated to describe acquired clinical skills at the 2017 training. A one-way ANOVA test was performed to assess the differences between cadres scores in the tests and the OSCEs. ResultsIn 2017, pre and post scores were significantly different within cadres except imidwives: physicians t(5)=8.77(p<0.05), midwives t(1)=5,29 (p=0,11) and nurses t(7)=7,91(p<0.05) In 2018, the mean score was 67% ({+/-} 10.31) on the pre-test and was 82% ({+/-} 5.78) in 2017 post-test. The difference was significant (t(7)=4.80, p<0.05). Scores were significantly different between cadres in PPH [F=(2,13)=6.17, p <0.05)] and dystocia [F=(2,13)=3.92, p <0.05)]. ConclusionAn immediate gain in knowledge and acquisition of critical skills was observed in all cadres. Knowledge significantly decreased eight months following AIP training. Supervision, mentoring of trainees and continuing medical education are needed following the initial training.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.