Back

COVID-19: Easing the coronavirus lockdowns with caution

Alabi, R. O.; Siemuri, A.; Elmusrati, M.

2020-05-14 health informatics
10.1101/2020.05.10.20097295 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe spread of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has reached a global level, creating a pandemic. The government of various countries, their citizens, politicians, and business owners are worried about the unavoidable economic impacts of this pandemic. Therefore, there is an eagerness for the pandemic peaking. ObjectivesThis study uses an objective approach to emphasize the need to be pragmatic with easing of lockdowns measures worldwide through the forecast of the possible trend of COVID-19. This is necessary to ensure that the enthusiasm about SARS-CoV-2 peaking is properly examined, easing of lockdown is done systematically to avoid second-wave of the pandemic. MethodsWe used the Facebook prophet on the World Health Organization data for COVID-19 to forecast the spread of SARS-CoV-2 for the 7th April until 3rd May 2020. The forecast model was further used to forecast the trend of the virus for the 8th until 14th May 2020. We presented the forecast of the confirmed and death cases. ResultsOur findings from the forecast showed an increase in the number of new cases for this period. Therefore, the need for easing the lockdown with caution becomes imperative. Our model showed good performance when compared to the official report from the World Health Organization. The average forecasting accuracy of our model was 79.6%. ConclusionAlthough, the global and economic impact of COVID-19 is daunting. However, excessive optimism about easing the lockdown should be appropriately weighed against the risk of underestimating its spread. As seen globally, the risks appeared far from being symmetric. Therefore, the forecasting provided in this study offers an insight into the spread of the virus for effective planning and decision-making in terms of easing the lockdowns in various countries.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.0%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.2%
4
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.2%
5
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
6
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
8
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
10
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
12
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
13
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
15
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
17
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
22
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%