Critical levels of mask efficiency and of mask adoption that theoretically extinguish respiratory virus epidemics
Kot, A. D.
Show abstract
Using a respiratory virus epidemiological model we derive equations for the critical levels of mask efficiency (fraction blocked) and of mask adoption (fraction of population wearing masks) that lower the effective reproduction number to unity. The model extends a basic epidemiological model and assumes that a specified fraction of a population dons masks at a given initial number of infections. The model includes a contribution from the ocular (nasolacrimal duct) route, and does not include contributions from contact (fomite) routes. The model accommodates dose-response (probability of infection) functions that are linear or non-linear. Our motivation to study near-population-wide mask wearing arises from the concept that, between two mask wearers, the concentration of particles at inhalation should be the square of the mask penetration fraction. This combination, or team, of masks can provide a strong dose-lowering squaring effect, which enables the use of lower-efficiency, lower-cost, lower pressure-drop (easier breathing) masks. For an epidemic with basic reproduction number R0 = 2.5 and with a linear dose-response, the critical mask efficiency is calculated to be 0.5 for a mask adoption level of 0.8 of the population. Importantly, this efficiency is well below that of a N95 mask, and well above that of some fabric masks. Numerical solutions of the model at near-critical levels of mask efficiency and mask adoption demonstrate avoidance of epidemics. To be conservative we use mask efficiencies measured with the most-penetrating viral-particle sizes. The critical mask adoption level for surgical masks with an efficiency of 0.58 is computed to be 0.73. With surgical masks (or equally efficient substitutes) and 80% and 90% adoption levels, respiratory epidemics with R0 of about 3 and 4, respectively, would be theoretically extinguished.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk assessment for airborne disease transmission by poly-pathogen aerosols 96%
- SARS-CoV-2 infection dynamics in Denmark, February through October 2020: Nature of the past epidemic and how it may develop in the future 94%
- Spatio-temporal spread of COVID-19: Comparison of the inhomogeneous SEPIR model and data from South Carolina 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protein aggregation and membrane bending govern nanotube morphology. 95%
- Evaluation of Different Types of Face Masks to Limit the Spread of SARS-CoV-2 – A Modeling Study 95%
- Ranking the Effectiveness of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions to Counter COVID-19 in UK Universities with Vaccinated Population 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Modular Framework for Multiscale Spatial Modeling of Viral Infection and Immune Response in Epithelial Tissue 94%
- The multi-dimensional challenges of controlling respiratory virus transmission in indoor spaces: Insights from the linkage of a microscopic pedestrian simulation and SARS-CoV-2 transmission model 94%
- Metabolic reprogramming dynamics in tumor spheroids: Insights from a multicellular, multiscale model 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A genuinely hybrid, multiscale 3D cancer invasion and metastasis modelling framework 94%
- A Computational Framework for the Administration of 5-Aminovulinic Acid before Glioblastoma Surgery 94%
- Modeling and Global Sensitivity Analysis of Strategies to Mitigate Covid-19 Transmission on a Structured College Campus 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.