The Coronavirus 2019 pandemic in Canada: the impact of public health interventions on the course of the outbreak in Alberta and other provinces
Mahsin, M.; Lee, S.; Vickers, D.; Guigue, A.; Williamson, T.; Quan, H.; Quinn, R. R.; Ravani, P.
Show abstract
Background: The SARS-CoV-2 disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has spread across the world with varying impact on health systems and outcomes. We assessed how the type and timing of public-health interventions impacted the course of the outbreak in Alberta and the other Canadian provinces. Methods: We used publicly-available data to summarize rates of laboratory data and mortality in relation to measures implemented to contain the outbreak and testing strategy. We estimated the transmission potential of SARS-CoV-2 before the state of emergency declaration for each province (R0) and at the study end date (Rt). Results: The first cases were confirmed in Ontario (January 25) and British Columbia (January 28). All provinces implemented the same health-policy measures between March 12 and March 30. Alberta had a higher percentage of the population tested (3.8%) and a lower mortality rate (3/100,000) than Ontario (2.6%; 11/100,000) or Quebec (3.1%; 31/100,000). British Columbia tested fewer people (1.7%) and had similar mortality as Alberta. Data on provincial testing strategies were insufficient to inform further analyses. Mortality rates increased with increasing rates of lab-confirmed cases in Ontario and Quebec, but not in Alberta. Ro was similar across all provinces, but varied widely from 2.6 (95% confidence intervals 1.9-3.4) to 6.4 (4.3-8.5), depending on the assumed time interval between onset of symptoms in a primary and a secondary case (serial interval). The outbreak is currently under control in Alberta, British Columbia and Nova Scotia (Rt <1). Interpretation: COVID-19-related health outcomes varied by province despite rapid implementation of similar health-policy interventions across Canada. Insufficient information about provincial testing strategies and a lack of primary data on serial interval are major limitations of existing data on the Canadian COVID-19 outbreak.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Lessons From The COVID-19 Third Wave In Canada: The Impact Of Variants Of Concern And Shifting Demographics 94%
- Heterogeneity in risk, testing and outcome of COVID-19 across outbreak settings in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada: an observational study 92%
- What factors converged to create a COVID-19 hot-spot? Lessons from the South Asian community in Ontario 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Adjustment for Differential Testing by Age and Sex on Apparent Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Ontario, Canada 91%
- Association Between Seasonal Respiratory Virus Activity and Invasive Pneumococcal Disease in Central Ontario, Canada 90%
- Epidemiological and socio-economic characteristics of the COVID-19 spring outbreak in Quebec, Canada: A population-based study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, and other seasonal respiratory virus circulation in Canada 94%
- Quantifying COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy during early vaccination rollout in Canada 90%
- Lives saved and hospitalizations averted by COVID-19 vaccination in New York City 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Syndromic Surveillance for COVID-19 in Canada 90%
- Evaluating respiratory syncytial virus immunization strategies for infants in Canada: a cost-utility analysis 90%
- Pre-outbreak determinants of perceived risks of corona infection and preventive measures taken. A prospective population-based study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of all-cause mortality among patients hospitalized with influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, or SARS-CoV-2 89%
- Effectiveness of 2024/25 KP.2 vaccine against outpatient COVID-19 in Canada 89%
- The REinfection in COVID-19 Estimation of Risk (RECOVER) study: Reinfection and serology dynamics in a cohort of Canadian healthcare workers 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.