Back

The Coronavirus 2019 pandemic in Canada: the impact of public health interventions on the course of the outbreak in Alberta and other provinces

Mahsin, M.; Lee, S.; Vickers, D.; Guigue, A.; Williamson, T.; Quan, H.; Quinn, R. R.; Ravani, P.

2020-05-13 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.05.09.20096636 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has spread across the world with varying impact on health systems and outcomes. We assessed how the type and timing of public-health interventions impacted the course of the outbreak in Alberta and the other Canadian provinces. Methods: We used publicly-available data to summarize rates of laboratory data and mortality in relation to measures implemented to contain the outbreak and testing strategy. We estimated the transmission potential of SARS-CoV-2 before the state of emergency declaration for each province (R0) and at the study end date (Rt). Results: The first cases were confirmed in Ontario (January 25) and British Columbia (January 28). All provinces implemented the same health-policy measures between March 12 and March 30. Alberta had a higher percentage of the population tested (3.8%) and a lower mortality rate (3/100,000) than Ontario (2.6%; 11/100,000) or Quebec (3.1%; 31/100,000). British Columbia tested fewer people (1.7%) and had similar mortality as Alberta. Data on provincial testing strategies were insufficient to inform further analyses. Mortality rates increased with increasing rates of lab-confirmed cases in Ontario and Quebec, but not in Alberta. Ro was similar across all provinces, but varied widely from 2.6 (95% confidence intervals 1.9-3.4) to 6.4 (4.3-8.5), depending on the assumed time interval between onset of symptoms in a primary and a secondary case (serial interval). The outbreak is currently under control in Alberta, British Columbia and Nova Scotia (Rt <1). Interpretation: COVID-19-related health outcomes varied by province despite rapid implementation of similar health-policy interventions across Canada. Insufficient information about provincial testing strategies and a lack of primary data on serial interval are major limitations of existing data on the Canadian COVID-19 outbreak.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.6%
2
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
4
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
5
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.1%
7
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
8
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
9
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
11
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
12
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
13
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
15
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
16
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
17
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
20
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
21
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
22
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
24
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
25
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
27
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
28
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
29
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%