Back

Psychological Distress Among People Losing Work During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia

Collie, A.; Sheehan, L.; van Vreden, C.; Grant, G.; Whiteford, P.; Petrie, D.; Sim, M. R.

2020-05-12 public and global health
10.1101/2020.05.06.20093773 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThis study estimated the extent of psychological distress among people losing work during the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Australia, and examined associations between distress, nature of work loss and degree of social interaction. MethodsData were from a baseline online survey of an inception cohort recruited in the weeks following the introduction of physical distancing and movement restrictions to contain the spread of COVID-19 in Australia. These restrictions resulted in widespread unemployment and working hour reduction. Psychological distress was measured using the Kessler-6 scale. Data on nature of work loss, social interactions, demographic, job and occupational characteristics were also collected. Regression modelling was conducted to determine the relationship between work loss, social interactions and psychological distress, accounting for confounders. ResultsAmong the 551 study participants 31% reported severe psychological distress, 35% in those with job loss and 28% in those still employed but working less. Those who had significantly greater odds of high psychological distress were younger, female, had lost their job and had lower social interactions. The relationship between job loss and distress became non-significant when financial stress, and occupation were included in the regression model, but the protective effect of higher social interactions remained significant. DiscussionThere was a high prevalence of psychological distress in people losing work during the coronavirus pandemic. Age, gender, job loss and social interactions were strongly associated with distress. Interventions that promote social interaction may help to reduce distress during among people losing work during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
3
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
5
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
6
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
9
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
11
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
12
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.8%
14
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
18
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
23
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%