Back

Prognostic Factors For Clinical Course Of Patients With COVID-19: Protocol For A Rapid Living Systematic Review

Rocha Filho, C. R.; Pinto, A. C. P. N.; Rocha, A. P.; Milby, K. M. M.; Reis, F. S. d. A.; Civile, V. T.; Carvas Junior, N.; Santos, R. R. P.; Ramalho, G. S.; Trevisani, G. F. M.; Ferla, L. J.; Puga, M. E. S.; Trevisani, V. F. M.; Atallah, A. N.

2020-05-09 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.05.06.20087692 medRxiv
Show abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVEDetermining prognostic factors in a context of health crises such as the COVID-19 scenario may provide the best possible care for patients and optimize the management and the resource utilization of the health system. Thus, we aim to systematically review the prognostic factors for different outcomes of patients with COVID-19. DESIGN AND SETTING: Protocol for a rapid living systematic review methodology following the recommendations proposed by the Cochrane Handbook. METHODS: We will include cohorts and case-control studies. We will search Medline via PubMed, Embase via Elsevier, Cochrane Library - Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Portal Regional BVS-LILACS, Scopus and WebofScience to identify studies. No language restrictions will be applied. We will perform the critical appraisal of included studies with the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool and the certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.