Weather Conditions and COVID-19 Transmission: Estimates and Projections
Xu, R.; Rahmandad, H.; Gupta, M.; DiGennaro, C.; Ghaffarzadegan, N.; Jalali, M. S.
Show abstract
BackgroundUnderstanding and projecting the spread of COVID-19 requires reliable estimates of the impact of weather on the transmission of the virus. Prior research on this topic has been inconclusive. We estimate the impact of weather on transmission by assembling one of the largest datasets integrating COVID-19 infections and weather, and use the results to project weather impact on transmission in the coming months. MethodsWe assemble a dataset that includes virus transmission and weather data across 3,739 locations from December 12, 2019 to April 22, 2020. Using simulation, we identify key challenges to reliable estimation of weather impacts on transmission, design a statistical method to overcome these challenges, and validate it in a blinded simulation study. Controlling for location-specific response trends we then estimate how different weather variables are associated with the reproduction number for COVID-19. We then use the estimates to project the relative weather-related risk of COVID-19 transmission across the world and in large cities. ResultsWe show that the delay between exposure and detection of infection complicates the estimation of weather impact on COVID-19 transmission, potentially explaining significant variability in results to date. Correcting for that distributed delay and offering conservative estimates, we find a negative relationship between temperatures above 25 degrees Celsius and estimated reproduction number ([Formula]), with each degree Celsius associated with a 3.1% (95% CI: 1.5-4.8%) reduction in [Formula]. Higher levels of relative humidity strengthen the negative effect of temperature above 25 degrees. Moreover, one millibar of additional pressure increases [Formula] by approximately 0.8 percent (0.6-1%) at the median pressure (1016 millibars) in our sample. We also find significant positive effects for wind speed, precipitation, and diurnal temperature on [Formula]. Sensitivity analysis and simulations show that results are robust to multiple assumptions. Despite conservative estimates, weather effects are associated with a 43% change in [Formula] between the 5th and 95th percentile of weather conditions in our sample. ConclusionsThe results provide evidence for the relationship between several weather variables and the spread of COVID-19, finding a negative association between temperature and humidity and transmission. However, the (conservatively) estimated effects of summer weather are not strong enough to seasonally control the epidemic in most locations.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of weather-related social distancing on city-scale transmission of respiratory viruses 93%
- Assessment of the fatality rate and transmissibility taking account of undetected cases during an unprecedented COVID-19 surge in Taiwan 91%
- Predicting subnational incidence of COVID-19 cases and deaths in EU countries 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early estimates of COVID-19 infections in small, medium and large population clusters 91%
- Is there a role for RDTs as we live with COVID? An assessment of different strategies 91%
- Modelling the effect of infection prevention and control measures on rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission to clinic attendees in primary health clinics in South Africa 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling pooling strategies for SARS-CoV-2 testing in a university setting 89%
- Inferring the number of COVID-19 cases from recently reported deaths 89%
- Estimating required lockdown cycles before immunity to SARS-CoV-2: Model-based analyses of susceptible population sizes, S0, in seven European countries including the UK and Ireland 89%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.