Efficacy of remdesivir in COVID-19 patients with a simulated two-arm controlled study
Hsu, C.-Y.; Lai, C.-C.; Yen, A. M.-F.; Chen, S. L.-S.; Chen, H.-H.
Show abstract
While the recent study on the compassionate use of remdesivir for COVID-19 patients has shown a 68% clinical improvement7 it is a one-arm study that renders the evaluation of the efficacy in reducing death and the length of stay of hospitalization intractable due to a lacking of the control group. We came up with a two-arm controlled study design to simulate the treated and the untreated (control group) group by applying two respective transition models to the empirical data on dynamics of the disease severity (Figure 2 of the original article7) that are classified into low- (no and low oxygen supplement), medium- (non-invasive ventilator and high oxygen supplement), and high-(ECMO and invasive ventilator) from enrolment until discharge, death or the end of follow-up. By using a simulated two-arm controlled study, the remdesivir treatment group as opposed to the control group led to a statistically significantly 29% (95% CI: 22-35%) reduction of death from COVID-19. The treated group also revealed a 33% (95% CI 28-38%) significantly higher odds of discharge than the control group. The median time to discharge for the treated group (5.5 days, 16.5 days, and 29.5 days for low-, medium-, and high-risk state, respectively) was around half of those of the control arm. Our results with a simulated two-arm controlled study have not only corroborated the efficacy of remdesivir but also made great contribution to designing a further large-scale randomized controlled trial. They have significant implications for reducing transmission probability and infectious time of COVID-19 patients when contacting with susceptible health care workers during hospitalization. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=100 SRC="FIGDIR/small/20088559v1_fig2.gif" ALT="Figure 2"> View larger version (18K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c9a456org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1442cdeorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ddd9d6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10895f9_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 2.C_FLOATNO Cumulative rate of discharge and death by treatments C_FIG Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat is the efficacy of remdesivir in reducing advanced disease state or death from COVID-19 and the length of stay of hospitalization? FindingsRemdesivir treatment results in a 33% significantly higher odds of discharge, a 29% significantly lower risk of death, and a 39% significantly lower risk for the combined endpoint of severe status and death. The median time to discharge for the remdesivir treated group was around half of the median time-to-discharge compared with the control arm. MeaningRemdesivir is effective in treating COVID-19 patients in terms of enhancing recovery and accelerating discharge.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Detailed disease progression of 213 patients hospitalized with Covid-19 in the Czech Republic: An exploratory analysis 95%
- Remdesivir as a tool to relieve hospital care systems stressed by COVID-19: A modelling study on bed resources and budget impact 94%
- Hydroxychloroquine For The Treatment Of Severe Respiratory Infection By COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-World Effectiveness Of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir On COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization Prevention: A Population-Based Cohort Study In The Province Of Québec, Canada 93%
- Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 92%
- Interim Analysis of Risk Factors for Severe Outcomes among a Cohort of Hospitalized Adults Identified through the U.S. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network (COVID-NET) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse effects of remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, and lopinavir/ritonavir when used for COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials 92%
- Efficacy of remdesivir versus placebo for the treatment of COVID-19: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 92%
- Efficacy of Lactococcus lactis strain plasma (LC-Plasma) in easing symptoms in patients with mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): protocol for an exploratory, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial (PLATEAU study) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hospitalization and 30-day fatality in 121,263 COVID-19 outpatient cases 92%
- Quantifying absolute treatment effect heterogeneity for time-to-event outcomes across different risk strata: divergence of conclusions with risk difference and restricted mean survival difference 91%
- Cohort Profile: Post-hospitalisation COVID-19 study (PHOSP-COVID) 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Electronic Early Notification of Sepsis in Hospitalized Ward Patients (SCREEN): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 94%
- Electronic early notification of sepsis in hospitalized ward patients: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 92%
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.