Back

Transcriptomic expression patterns of two contrasting lowland rice varieties reveal high iron stress tolerance

Kar, S.; Mai, H.-J.; Khalouf, H.; Ben Abdallah, H.; Flachbart, S.; Fink-Straube, C.; Braeutigam, A.; Xiong, G.; Shang, L.; Panda, S. K.; Bauer, P.

2020-05-02 plant biology
10.1101/2020.05.01.070516 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Iron (Fe) toxicity is a major challenge for plant cultivation in acidic water-logged soil environments, where lowland rice is a major staple food crop. Only few studies addressed the molecular characterization of excess Fe tolerance in rice, and these highlight different mechanisms for Fe tolerance in the studied varieties. Here, we screened 16 lowland rice varieties for excess Fe stress growth responses to identify contrasting lines, Fe-tolerant Lachit and -susceptible Hacha. Hacha and Lachit differed in their physiological and morphological responses to excess Fe, including leaf growth, leaf rolling, reactive oxygen species generation, Fe and metal contents. These responses were mirrored by differential gene expression patterns, obtained through RNA-sequencing, and corresponding GO term enrichment in tolerant versus susceptible lines. From the comparative transcriptomic profiles between Lachit and Hacha in response to excess Fe stress, individual genes of the category metal homeostasis, mainly root-expressed, may contribute to the tolerance of Lachit. 22 out of these 35 metal homeostasis genes are present in selection sweep genomic regions, in breeding signatures and/or differentiated during rice domestication. These findings will serve to design targeted Fe tolerance breeding of rice crops. Summary statementLowland rice varieties Hacha and Lachit were selected for contrasting abilities to cope with iron excess stress. Morphological and physiological phenotypes were mirrored by molecular transcriptome changes, indicating altered metal homeostasis in the root as an adaptive tolerance mechanism in Lachit.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.1%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
11.6%
3
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.7%
4
Environmental and Experimental Botany
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Plant Science
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
7
Physiologia Plantarum
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
8
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
9
Planta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
10
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
11
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
12
Plant Stress
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
13
Plant and Cell Physiology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
14
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
16
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
18
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
19
Antioxidants
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Plant Molecular Biology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Plant and Soil
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
22
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Plant Cell Reports
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%