Diagnostic value of self-report compared with Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) in screening of depression
taghizadeh, f.; zarghami, m.; mousazadeh, m.
Show abstract
BackgroundDepression is a common cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. To detect depression, we compared Beck Depression Inventory scoring as a valid tool with participants self-reporting depression. MethodologyThis cross-sectional study aimed to explore the diagnostic values of self-reporting in patients with depression comparing to Beck Depression Inventory scoring in Mazandaran Persian cohort study, with a total of 1300 samples. The sample size was determined to include 155 participants through the census method. In order to increase the test power, 310 healthy participants were included in the study through random selection. In order to evaluate the diagnostic value of self-reporting, BDI-II was completed by blind interviewing to the case group as well as to another group who reported that they were not depressed, as control. ResultsSensitivity, specificity, accuracy, false positive, false negative, positive and negative predictive values of self-reporting was calculated 58.4%, 79.1%,73.4%, 20.8%, 41.6%, 51.8%, and 83.2% for the total population respectively, as well as, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of self-report in males were 83.3%, 77.2%, 77.1%, 43.8% and 95.6% and 53.7%, 78.1%, 71.2%, 49.2%, and 81.1% for females, respectively. ConclusionThe positive predictive value and sensitivity of self-reporting are insufficient in total population and females, and therefore self-reporting cannot detect depressed patients, but regarding to its average positive predictive value, perhaps, it can be used to identify non-depressant individuals.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Association Study Of Six Candidate Genes With Major Depressive Disorder In The North-Western Population Of Pakistan 97%
- Fear among Syrians: a Proposed Cutoff Score and Validation of the Arabic Fear of COVID-19 Scale- A National Survey 96%
- Personality traits and other factors associated with psychotropic medication non-adherence at two hospitals in Uganda. A cross-sectional study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transdiagnostic neurocognitive deficits in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia: A 1-year follow-up study 94%
- Prevalence and Risk Factors for Acute Posttraumatic Stress Disorder during the COVID-19 Outbreak 94%
- Closed Doors: Predictors of Stress, Anxiety, Depression, and PTSD During the Onset of COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Higher levels of serum IL-1β and TNF-α are associated with an increased probability of major depressive disorder 97%
- The recurrence of illness (ROI) index is a key factor in major depression that indicates increasing immune-linked neurotoxicity and vulnerability to suicidal behaviors. 96%
- Generalized anxiety disorder, depressive symptoms and sleep quality during COVID-19 epidemic in China: a web-based cross-sectional survey 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental health status of the general population, healthcare professionals, and university students during 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak in Jordan: a cross-sectional study 94%
- Assessment of Post SARS CoV 2 Fatigue among Physicians Working in COVID Designated Hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh 91%
- Life beyond childhood: insight into the lived experience of 91 adults with KBG syndrome through an online patient/caregiver reported co-produced questionnaire 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Depression polygenic scores are associated with major depressive disorder diagnosis and depressive episode in Mexican adolescents 93%
- Prognostic Nutritional Index and Post-Stroke Depression: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Analysis of NHANES 2005-2018 Data 92%
- Predictors of black fungus fear during the COVID-19 pandemic among the Bangladeshi health workers: a cross-sectional study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.