Back

Rapid development of COVID-19 rapid diagnostics for low resource settings: accelerating delivery through transparency, responsiveness, and open collaboration

Adams, E. R.; Augustin, Y.; Byrne, R. L.; Clark, D. J.; Cocozza, M.; Cubas-Atienzar, A. I.; Cuevas, L. E.; Cusinato, M.; Davies, B. M. O.; Davies, M.; Davies, P.; Duvoix, A.; Eckersley, N. M.; Edwards, T.; Fletcher, T.; Fraser, A. j.; Garrod, G.; Hadcocks, L.; Hu, Q.; johnson, M.; Kay, G. A.; Keymer, K.; Kirwan, D.; Klekotko, K.; Lewis, Z.; Mason, J.; Mensah-Kane, J.; Menzies, S.; Monahan, I.; Moore, C. M.; Nebe-von-Caron, G.; Owen, S. I.; Planche, T.; Sainter, C.; Schouten, J.; Staines, H. M.; Turtle, L.; Williams, C.; Wilkins, J.; Woolston, K.; Sall, A. A.; Fitchett, J. R. A.; Krishna, S.

2020-05-05 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.04.29.20082099 medRxiv
Show abstract

Here we describe an open and transparent consortium for the rapid development of COVID-19 rapid diagnostics tests. We report diagnostic accuracy data on the Mologic manufactured IgG COVID-19 ELISA on known positive serum samples and on a panel of known negative respiratory and viral serum samples pre-December 2019. In January, Mologic, embarked on a product development pathway for COVID-19 diagnostics focusing on ELISA and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), with anticipated funding from Wellcome Trust and DFID. 834 clinical samples from known COVID-19 patients and hospital negative controls were tested on Mologics IgG ELISA. The reported sensitivity on 270 clinical samples from 124 prospectively enrolled patients was 94% (95% CI: 89.60% - 96.81%) on day 10 or more post laboratory diagnosis, and 96% (95% CI: 84.85% - 99.46%) between 14-21 days post symptom onset. A specificity panel comprising 564 samples collected pre-December 2019 were tested to include most common respiratory pathogens, other types of coronavirus, and flaviviruses. Specificity in this panel was 97% (95% CI: 95.65% - 98.50%). This is the first in a series of Mologic products for COVID-19, which will be deployed for COVID-19 diagnosis, contact tracing and sero-epidemiological studies to estimate disease burden and transmission with a focus on ensuring access, affordability, and availability to low-resource settings.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.