Curbing the AI-induced enthusiasm in diagnosing COVID-19 on chest X-Rays: the present and the near-future
Burlacu, A.; Crisan-Dabija, R.; Popa, I. V.; Artene, B.; Birzu, V.; Pricop, M.; Plesoianu, C.; Generali, D.
Show abstract
In the current context of COVID-19 pandemic, a rapid and accessible screening tool based on image processing of chest X-rays (CXRs) using machine learning (ML) approaches would be much needed. Initially, we intended to create and validate an ML software solution able to discriminate on the basis of the CXR between SARS-CoV-2-induced bronchopneumonia and other bronchopneumonia etiologies. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and arXiv databases using the following search terms ["artificial intelligence" OR "deep learning" OR "neural networks"], AND ["COVID-19" OR "SARS-CoV-2"] AND ["chest X-ray" OR "CXR" OR "X-ray"] found 14 recent studies. Most of them declared to be able to confidently identify COVID-19 based on CXRs using deep neural networks. Firstly, weaknesses of artificial intelligence (AI) solutions were analyzed, tackling the issues with datasets (from both medical and technical points of view) and the vulnerability of used algorithms. Then, arguments were provided for why our study design is stronger and more realistic than the previously quoted papers, balancing the possible false expectations with facts. The authors consider that the potential of AI use in COVID-19 diagnosis on CXR is real. However, scientific community should be careful in interpreting statements, results and conclusions regarding AI use in imaging. It is therefore necessary to adopt standards for research and publication of data, because it seems that in the recent months scientific reality suffered manipulations and distortions. Also, a call for responsible approaches to the imaging methods in COVID-19 is raised. It seems mandatory to follow some rigorous approaches in order to provide with adequate results in daily routine. In addition, the authors intended to raise public awareness about the quality of AI protocols and algorithms and to encourage public sharing of as many CXR images with common quality standards.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Two-Step Machine Learning to Diagnose and Predict Involvement of Lungs in COVID-19 and Pneumonia using CT Radiomics 96%
- Deep learning ensemble for abdominal aortic calcification scoring from lumbar spine X-ray and DXA images 92%
- The mathematics of erythema: Development of machine learning models for artificial intelligence assisted measurement and severity scoring of radiation induced dermatitis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation 95%
- Classification of Hyper-scale Multimodal Imaging Datasets 93%
- A Comparison of CXR-CAD Software to Radiologists in Identifying COVID-19 in Individuals Evaluated for Sars CoV 2 Infection in Malawi and Zambia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- ai-corona : Radiologist-Assistant Deep Learning Framework for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Chest CT Scans 94%
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 94%
- Automated Detection of COVID-19 through Convolutional Neural Network using Chest x-ray images 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-Classifier: An automated machine learning model to assist in the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection in chest x-ray images 94%
- Toward Understanding COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Deep-learning-based Approach for Severity Analysis and Monitoring the Disease 94%
- MultiCOVID: a multi modal Deep Learning approach for COVID-19 diagnosis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 95%
- Auto-detection of motion artifacts on CT pulmonary angiograms with a physician-trained AI algorithm 94%
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.