Communicating with patients and families about difficult matters: A rapid review in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
Ekberg, S.; Parry, R.; Land, V.; Ekberg, K.; Pino, M.; Antaki, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundPandemics pose significant challenges for healthcare systems, including an increase in difficult discussions about future illness progression and end of life. ObjectivesTo synthesise existing evidence about communication practices used to discuss difficult matters, including prognosis and end of life, and to use this evidence to make recommendations for clinical practice. The aim of this study was to use rapid review methods to update findings from a previous systematic review published in 2014. Data sourcesMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts, Web of Science, Scopus, ASSIA and Amed. Study eligibility criteriaStudies using conversation analysis or discourse analysis to examine recordings of actual conversations about difficult matters relating to future illness progression and end of life. Study appraisal and synthesis methodsData appraisal and extraction procedures used in the 2014 review were modified for this rapid review. ResultsFollowing screening, 18 sources were deemed to meet eligibility criteria, which were added to the 19 sources included in the 2014 systematic review. Synthesis of study findings identified 11 communication practices: providing opportunities for patient or family members to propose matters to discuss (7 out of 37 included sources); seeking a patient or family members perspective (6/37); discussing the future indirectly (11/37); discussing the future explicitly (7/37) linking to something previously said or done (11/37); using hypothetical scenarios (13/37); framing a difficult matter as universal (5/37); acknowledging uncertainty (3/37); exploring options (2/37); displaying sensitivity (7/37); emphasising the positive (7/37). LimitationsDividing work amongst the study authors to enable rapid review may have created inconsistencies. Conclusions and implications of key findingsThis synthesis of high-quality evidence from actual clinical practice supports a series of recommendations for communicating about difficult matters during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 93%
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 92%
- Which outcomes should be included in a core outcome set for capturing and measuring doctor well-being? A Delphi study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Uncertainty in serious illness: A national interdisciplinary consensus exercise to identify clinical research priorities 93%
- STIMULATE-ICP-Delphi (Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways Delphi): Study Protocol 92%
- Feasibility trial of a new digital training package to enhance primary care practitioners' communication of clinical empathy and realistic optimism 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of the Kunonga Framework for Extending Approaches in Health Inequality and Inequity Evidence Syntheses 93%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and well-being of people living with a long-term physical health condition: a qualitative study 92%
- How, why and when are delayed (back-up) antibiotic prescriptions used in primary care? A realist review integrating concepts of uncertainty in healthcare 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accessibility, inclusivity, and implementation of COVID-19 clinical management guidelines early in the pandemic: a global survey 92%
- Improving modelling for epidemic responses: reflections from members of the UK infectious disease modelling community on their experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic 89%
- The feasibility of an objective measure of the parent-child relationship in health visiting practice: assessment of the Maternal Postnatal Attachment Scale 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare Workers' Mental Health and Wellbeing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK: Contrasting Guidelines with Experiences in Practice 93%
- Secondary Stressors And Their Psychosocial Impacts On Healthcare Staff: Lessons From A Qualitative Systematic Review From The COVID-19 Pandemic In The UK 92%
- ‘I had no life. I was only existing’ . Factors shaping the mental health and wellbeing of people experiencing long Covid: a qualitative study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.