Correlation analysis of risk factors and GSI score of a medical team assisting Wuhan city during the epidemic of COVID-19 in China -A cohort study
Jinlong, Z.; Cheng, W.; Zhaohui, L.; Jingquan, W.; Yunyun, F.; Yanlin, W.; Xia, C.; Na, H.; Xiaolei, J.
Show abstract
ImportanceThere are few studies on the psychological status of medical staff during the COVID-19 outbreak. This study is the first in the world about the psychological status of the medical team during the COVID-19 outbreak. ObjectiveTo study the correlation between risk factors and general symptom index (GSI) score of medical team members who support Wuhan against COVID-19. DesignCohort study. SettingPopulation-based. ParticipantsAnhui Province sent a total of eight medical teams, including 1382 members, to support Hubei Province. We adopted a stratified sampling method and selected the fourth team sent by Anhui Provincial Hospital, with a total of 137 members as our subjects. ExposuresFour main exposures were collected, including basic information, preparations before going to Wuhan, life issues and working issues after going to Wuhan. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe GSI score of SCL-90 scale was used to reflect the frequency and intensity of psychological symptoms. We made the hypothesis of this study before data collection. Results110(80.29%) members completed the questionnaire, of which, 77(70.00%) female and 33(30.00%) male. When adjusted age, gender and covariates, DC, LCWT had a positive correlations with GSI score({beta} was10.17, 95%CI was 3.30 to 17.04 for DC, P=0.00<0.05; {beta} was 11.55, 95%CI was 0.40 to 22.71 for LCWT, P =0.04<0.05;respectively), RBT had a negative positive correlation with GSI score ({beta} was -28.09, 95%CI was -45.79 to -10.40, P=0.00<0.05), AoBI did not had a correlation with GSI score ({beta} was 11.55, 95%CI was 0.40 to 22.71, P=0.16>0.05). When adjusted covariates, DC had a positive and RBT had a negative correlation with GSI score of female ({beta} was 13.20, 95%CI was 4.55 to 21.85, P=0.00<0.05; {beta} was -57.85, 95%CI was -94.52 to -21.18, P=0.00<0.05; respectively), but for male was not (P=0.59>0.05, P=0.08>0.05, respectively), LCWT and AoBI didnt had correlation with GSI score between genders (P>0.05). Conclusions and RelevanceImproving DC, RBT and decreasing LCWT can reduce the GSI score. AoBI didnt affect the psychological status; male members have a more stable mood than female. Whether other countries medical team has the same result still needs further research. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat is the correlation between risk factors and general symptom index (GSI) score of medical team members who support Wuhan against COVID-19? FindingsDietary conditions (DC) had a positive and relationship between team (RBT) had a negative correlation with GSI score of female, but for male was not (P=0.59>0.05, P=0.08>0.05, respectively), lacking communication with teams (LCWT) and afraid of being infected (AoBI) didnt had correlation with GSI score between genders, a significant difference. MeaningImproving DC, RBT and decreasing LCWT between team members can reduce the GSI score. Whether they are AoBI, didnt affect the psychological status, male members have a more stable mood than female.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Long COVID and its associated factors among COVID survivors in the community from a middle-income country – an online cross-sectional study 96%
- Health-related quality of life of adult COVID-19 patients following one-month illness experience since diagnosis: findings of a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh 96%
- A cross-sectional survey of burnout in a sample of resident physicians in Sudan 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acculturation stressors and academic adjustment among Nepalese students in South Korean higher education institutions 95%
- Assessment of Experiences of Preventive Measures Practice including Vaccination History and Health Education among Umrah Pilgrims in Saudi Arabia, 1440H-2019 95%
- The psychological impact of 'mild lockdown' in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide survey under a declared state of emergency 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among the general population during COVID-19 outbreak in Iran: A national cross-sectional survey 95%
- Anxiety, depression, and insomnia among nurses during the full liberalization of COVID-19: A multicenter cross-sectional analysis of the high-income region in China 95%
- Spread of infection and treatment interruption among Japanese workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychiatric Manifestations and Associated Risk Factors among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in Edo State, Nigeria 95%
- Impact of COVID-19 on College Students' at One of the Most Diverse Campuses in the United States: A Factor Analysis of Survey Data 94%
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Medical overuse in the Iranian healthcare system: a systematic scoping review and practical recommendations for decreasing medical overuse during unexpected COVID-19 pandemic opportunity 94%
- Menstrual hygiene management practice and factors affecting it among high school females in Ambo City, Oromia state, Ethiopia, 2018: A cross-sectional mixed method. 93%
- Stethoscope and non-infrared thermometer disinfection among physicians: A cross-sectional study with implications for the control of COVID-19 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.