Back

Understanding the effects of the direct contacts and the indirect contacts on the epidemic spreading among beef cattle farms in southwest Kansas

Yi, C.; Yang, Q.; Scoglio, C.

2020-04-27 microbiology
10.1101/2020.04.27.063735 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Moving infected animals and sharing contaminated vehicles are considered as the most potent ways for between-farm disease transmission. The objective of this study is to develop a network-based simulation model to investigate the effects of direct contact, indirect contact, and their combination on a hypothetical foot-and-mouth disease spreading between beef-cattle farms in southwest Kansas, US, and explore the effect of different types of information-sharing networks on preventing the disease spreading. Based on synthetic cattle and truck movement data in southwest Kansas, we build a farm-level contact network with three layers, a cattle movement layer (direct contact), a truck movement layer (indirect contact), and an information-sharing layer. Through scenario analyses, we compare the disease transmission dynamics, the distribution of outbreak epidemic size, and the disease breakout percentage of different contact structures - only direct contact, only indirect contact, and their combination. In addition, we evaluate different types of information sharing methods by comparing the epidemic size and the estimated economic loss. Simulation results show that neither direct contact nor indirect contact individually can result in a massive outbreak of the disease, but their combination plays a significant role. Additionally, we detect different probabilities of disease outbreaks by starting the simulations at different farms; starting at some farms with high capacity increases the probability of disease outbreaks. Three different information sharing-networks are developed and found effective in preventing the disease from spreading and reducing the economic loss. The information-sharing layer based on trading records has the best performance when compared with a random network and a geographic network.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.0%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
7
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
8
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
11
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
12
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
17
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
18
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
22
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%