Back

Inequalities in COVID19 mortality related to ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation

Rose, T. C.; Mason, K.; Pennington, A.; McHale, P.; Taylor-Robinson, D. C.; Barr, B.

2020-04-30 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.04.25.20079491 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundInitial reports suggest that ethnic minorities may be experiencing more severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) outcomes. We therefore assessed the association between ethnic composition, income deprivation and COVID19 mortality rates in England. MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional ecological analysis across Englands upper-tier local authorities. We assessed the association between the proportion of the population from Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) backgrounds, income deprivation and COVID19 mortality rates using multivariable negative binomial regression, adjusting for population density, proportion of the population aged 50-79 and 80+ years, and the duration of the epidemic in each area. FindingsLocal authorities with a greater proportion of residents from ethnic minority backgrounds had statistically significantly higher COVID19 mortality rates, as did local authorities with a greater proportion of residents experiencing deprivation relating to low income. After adjusting for income deprivation and other covariates, each percentage point increase in the proportion of the population from BAME backgrounds was associated with a 1% increase in the COVID19 mortality rate [IRR=1.01, 95%CI 1.01-1.02]. Each percentage point increase in the proportion of the population experiencing income deprivation was associated with a 2% increase in the COVID19 mortality rate [IRR=1.02, 95%CI 1.01-1.04]. InterpretationThis study provides evidence that both income deprivation and ethnicity are associated with greater COVID19 mortality. To reduce these inequalities, Government needs to target effective control and recovery measures at these disadvantaged communities, proportionate to their greater needs and vulnerabilities, during and following the pandemic. FundingNational Institute of Health Research; Medical Research Council

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.1%
3
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.9%
7
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
8
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
10
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
12
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
14
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
15
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
16
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
19
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
21
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
23
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
24
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
26
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
28
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
30
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%