Back

A Nationwide Survey of UK cardiac surgeons view on clinical decision making during the COVID-19 pandemic

Benedetto, U.; Goodwin, A.; Kendall, S.; Uppal, R.; Akowuah, E.

2020-04-29 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2020.04.24.20078105
Show abstract

BackgroundNo firm recommendations are currently available to guide decision making for patients requiring cardiac surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Systematic appraisal of national expert consensus can be used to generate interim recommendations until data from clinical observations will become available. Hence, we aimed to collect and quantitatively appraise nationwide UK senior surgeons opinion on clinical decision making for patients requiring cardiac surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsWe mailed a web-based questionnaire to all consultant cardiac surgeons through the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland (SCTS) mailing list on the 17th April 2020 and we pre-determined to close the survey on the 21st April 2020. This survey was primarily designed to gather information on UK surgeons opinion using 12 items. Strong consensus was predefined as an opinion shared by at least 60% of responding consultants. ResultsA total of 86 consultant surgeons undertook the survey. All UK cardiac units were represented by at least one consultant. Strong consensus was achieved for the following key questions:1) before hospital admission every patient should receive nasopharyngeal swab, PCR and chest CT; 2) the use of full PPE should to be adopted in every case by the theatre team regardless patients COVID-19 status; 3) the risk of COVID-19 exposure for patients undergoing heart surgery should be considered moderate to high and likely to increase mortality if it occurs; 4) cardiac procedure should be decided based on ad-hoc multidisciplinary team discussion for every patient. The majority believed that both aortic and mitral surgery should be considered in selected cases. The role of CABG surgery during the pandemic was more controversial. ConclusionsIn the current unprecedented scenario, the present survey provides information for generating interim recommendations until data from clinical observations will become available. Perspective statementSystematic appraisal of national expert consensus can be used to generate interim recommendations for patients undergoing cardiac surgery during COVID-19 pandemic until data from clinical observations will become available. Central messageNo firm recommendations are currently available to guide decision making for patients requiring cardiac surgery during the pandemic. This can translate into significant variability in clinical practice and patients outcomes across cardiac units. Systematic appraisal of national expert consensus can represent a rapid and efficient instrument to provide support to heath policy makers and other stakeholders in generating interim recommendations until data from clinical observations will become available.

Matching journals

1
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 1%
9.4× avg
2
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
#1
88× avg
3
Heart
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
#1
95× avg
4
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.7%
23× avg
5
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 77%
3.0%
6
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 4%
7.3× avg
7
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
Top 4%
5.6× avg
8
International Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 2%
16× avg
9
Cureus
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 64 published papers
Top 11%
2.1× avg
10
BJGP Open
Royal College of General Practitioners · based on 12 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 12%
2.2× avg
12
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 17%
1.7× avg
13
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
9.1× avg
14
The Lancet Digital Health
Elsevier BV · based on 25 published papers
Top 4%
4.8× avg
15
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 82%
0.9%
16
Heart Rhythm
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 3%
5.5× avg
17
European Heart Journal
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 5%
5.2× avg
18
The American Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 4%
5.2× avg
19
BMJ
BMJ · based on 49 published papers
Top 6%
3.5× avg
20
Circulation: Heart Failure
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
9.9× avg