Back
#1
55.4%
Top 34%
19.6%
Top 0.1%
6.8%
Top 5%
2.1%
Top 13%
2.1%
Top 3%
1.6%
Top 86%
1.6%
Top 17%
1.0%
Top 2%
1.0%
Top 35%
0.6%
Top 19%
0.6%
Top 70%
0.6%
Top 27%
0.6%
Top 15%
0.6%
Comparison of Commercially Available and Laboratory Developed Assays for in vitro Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Laboratories
2020-04-27
pathology
Title + abstract only
View on medRxiv
Show abstract
Multiple laboratory developed tests and commercially available assays have emerged to meet diagnostic needs related to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. To date, there is limited comparison data for these different testing platforms. We compared the analytical performance of a laboratory developed test (LDT) developed in our clinical laboratory based on CDC primer sets and four commercially available, FDA emergency use authorized assays for SARS-CoV-2 (Cepheid, DiaSorin, Hologic Panther, and Roche Cobas)...
Predicted journal destinations
1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
77 training papers
2
PLOS ONE
1737 training papers
3
Microbiology Spectrum
86 training papers
4
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
124 training papers
5
Clinical Infectious Diseases
219 training papers
6
Journal of Clinical Virology
54 training papers
7
Scientific Reports
701 training papers
8
Cureus
64 training papers
9
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
24 training papers
10
JAMA Network Open
125 training papers
11
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
137 training papers
12
BMJ Open
553 training papers
13
Frontiers in Medicine
99 training papers
14
Journal of Medical Virology
95 training papers